My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05862
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05862
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:19:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2005
Author
DOI-USGS
Title
Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Palisades Lower Comanche and Arroyo Grande Areas of the Colorado River Corridor Grand Canyon Arizona
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Palisades, Lower Comanche, and Arroyo G:~iAreas of the Colorado River <br /> <br />t!"ti-,f' <br />with respecllo the CfoTada River) margin of the extensive <br />playa deposits behind the dune field. Section 4, 85 m soulh- <br />west of section ], is a pit dug into the surface ofa small playa <br />exposure west of the main playa area. <br />Geomorphic characteristics of the area surrounding <br />each archaeological site studied at Pat1sadcs are discussed in <br />appendix I (figs. 37 Ihrough 39). Stratigraphic data 'llld geo- <br />morphic observations are sUlllmarized in the section below <br />titled "Palisades Site Summary"'. <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />in 1998 and 1999 showed Ihat aeolian sedimenl deposited <br />after the 1996 BHBF flow had been relained at Palisades, <br />and that arroyo incision in the 3.5 years following the flood <br />had not yet reduced Ihe arroyo flood elevalion to its preflood <br />level (Hazel and olhers, 2000). Medium-formal photographic <br />stations were established before the 1996 BHBF flood at <br />locations where the an"oyo sho\'..:ed filling and erosion after <br />the flow. NPS archaeologists continue to take photographs <br />at those locations. as par! of the site-monitoring program. at <br />selected areas to monitor these processes near the mouths of <br />significant arroyos such as the one at Palisndes (for example, <br />Balsam and Larralde, 1996). <br /> <br />Archaeological Significance <br /> <br />The wide, relatively flat land in the Palisades area con- <br />tains abundant evidence of prehistoric human occupation. <br />Nine separate prehistoric archaeological sites have been iden- <br />tified, several of which contain multiple habitation and artifact <br />features (Nalional Park Service, 2004). Sites have been dated <br />by radiocarbon methods and artifact identification to Pueblo I <br />and Pueblo II (PI and PII) periods (A.D. 800-1000 and A.D. <br />1000-1150 respectively: Fairley and olhers. 1994). Several of <br />the sites are affected by the development of an arroyo system <br />in the central Palisades area, which has contributed to the loss <br />of anifacts in some areas. Check dams have been placed in <br />several branches of the arroyo by the National Park Service <br />(NPS) and representatives from the Zuni Tribe to reduce the <br />erosion of arti facts by arroyo incision (Leap and Coder. 1995). <br />To limit damage to archaeological sltes by visltor impact. NPS <br />relocated a section of the Beamer Trail through the Palisades <br />area in 1992. <br />In addition to prehistoric cultural features. historical arti- <br />facts are present at Palisades dating back to mining operations <br />in this area during the late 1800s and early 1900s. Two mine <br />shafts, with tailing piles, are left as evidence of copper ore <br />extraction at the Tanner-McCormick rnine, which ceased to be <br />actively mined in 1920. Historical feahlres include the remains <br />of a cabin (used betWeen 1890 ano 1910) wiih associated <br />metal and glass artifacts; many items have been removed by <br />visitors in the last few decades (Coder, 1994). <br /> <br />Stratigraphic and Geomorphic Analyses <br /> <br />Locations of stratigraphic sections described below are <br />shown on figure 2. Detailed stratigraphic logs are described <br />in appendix I (see figs. 32 through 36). Section I is a verti- <br />cal face that forms the north \\'311 of the main arroyo trunk <br />at low elevation. Section 2 is located 78 Illlandw~rd (east; <br />up-arroyo) from section 1, and was compiled from sediment <br />exposures in an arroyo wall as well as a shallow pit excavated <br />in the arroyo floor at the base of the naturally exposed wall. <br />Section 3 is located farther up the arroyo, 40 In from section <br />2, and is a pit dug into the surface at the northem (upstream, <br /> <br />Grain-Size Analyses <br /> <br />Figure 6 shows the results of grain-size analyses on two <br />horizons from section I. Unit F, an aeolian unit, is shown to be <br />coarser than unit G, a fluvial deposit within this stratigraphic <br />section. Figure 7 shows the grain-size distribution for unit H <br />of section J at Palisades; this horizon contained no diagnostic <br />sedimentary structures, and its depositional environment could <br />not be definitively ascertained in the field. The grain-size plot <br />is ambiguous also; this sample plots between the fields defined <br />by known fluvial and aeolian deposits (fig. 7). The most likely <br />explanation for this horizon is that it is a fluvial deposit that <br />has undergone some degree of winnowing by wlnd, but not <br />enough to remove all of the fine grains that would leave a <br />mahue aeolian lag deposit. <br />Grain-size analyses for three horizons within section 4 <br />are shown in figure 8. Three of these samples were collected <br />from unit B. a flood deposit wirh \....el1-defined fluvial climb- <br />ing ripples. This flood depo,it coarsens upward slightly (fig. <br />9). Upward coarsening of deposits has been attributed by <br />Rubin and olhers (1998) and Topping and others (2000a) to <br />sediment-supply limitation during the flood that deposited a <br />particular stratum. This inverse grading occurs as fine-grained <br />suspended sediment becomes progressively depleted through- <br />out the duration of the flood (the finer sizes having been <br />transponed downstream earliest and fanhest); given un1im. <br />ited sediment supply, constant bed conditions, and sufficient <br />accommodation space. a flood deposit should first coarsen and <br />- then fine upward. mimicking suspended-sedirllent respon-se to <br />Ihe hydrograph. Unit E of section 4, the poorly sorted distal <br />debris flow sediment. exhibits a coarser overall grain-size <br />profile thanlhe fluviallmils (fig. 8). The one sample analyzed <br />from the fluvial depositullit F in section 4 is finer than any of <br />the Ihree samples from lmil B (fig. 8). <br /> <br />Driftwood Elevation Survey: Palisades Stage- <br />Discharge Relationship <br /> <br />In order to establish an approximate stage-discharge <br />relationship for flood elevations in the Palisades area, the loca- <br />tion and elevation of driftwood logs were surveyed during <br />field work in May 2004 by D. J. Topping and 1. E. Hazel. <br />Horizont~l coordinates of survey data are referenced (0 the <br />NAD83( 1999) epoch and were projecled into NAD83 Ari- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.