My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05839
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05839
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:18:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8103.400
Description
Arkansas River Basin Legislation - Compacts
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/29/1949
Author
Unknown
Title
Arkansas River Compact - Hearing Before a Subcommittee on Interior and Insular Affairs - S1448 - 04-29-1949
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o ~ 12 81RKANSAS RIVER COMPACT <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Our commission first met in 1946, after the authorization py Con-. <br />gress; which consented to negotiations and the appointment of the <br />Federal representative, General Kramer. The negotiations have been <br />most prolonged due to the fact that we were obliged in a sense to make <br />two compacts, a compact with Kansas and a compact among our own <br />water interests in Colorado. They represented many difficulties and <br />would explain perhaps the undue prolongation of the situation. . <br />. Moreover, out of the total group of eight who originally started, we <br />have had sicknes.se~, ill hea~th on the part of practically all the mem- <br />bers of the commISSIOn, I thmk, except Mr. Ireland.. . <br />We C90perated and had the valuable cooperation of our water board, <br />of which J'udge Stone is the director, and which is charged with the <br />handling of interstate water problems; and Mr. Breitenstein, the at- <br />torney for the board, was also very cooperative and gave us a great <br />deal of valuable help; and Mr. Hinkley, recently attorney general for <br />two terms in Colorado, participated in our ne~otiations. If I am <br />permitted to bore you, perhaps, I enjoyed the sItuation, although it <br />was fraught with many annoyances and inconveniences. .We had, of <br />course, the valuable help of the Federal representative, General <br />Kramer, who well sustained his part of adviser and the ironing out of <br />difficulties and conflicts. <br />The Kansas representatives were most cooperative; and the Federal <br />agencies; all that we dealt with that were interested, particularly the <br />Corps of Engineers of the United States Army the Bureau of Recla- <br />matIOn, the Power Commission, Wildlife, and nmerous others who <br />participated at various times in our negotiations. <br />. The controversy originated more than 50 years ago. Nature affects <br />the situation more than in ordinary cases. In the years of abundant <br />water supply nobody said anything; in the years of short supply some- <br />body wanted to start a lawsuit. A brief resume of these lawsuits is <br />contained in the report that our commission filed with our Governor <br />and legislature before it was submitted to our legislature. . <br />The ~eneral basis of our compact is a 60-40 division of the water <br />stored m the Caddoa" officially known as the John Martin Reservoir, <br />kept by the United ~tates Government for flood-control and water- <br />conservation purposes, and administered by the Corps of Engineers. <br />The storage which we. divide on that general 60-40 basis is of <br />waters from the Puragtoire and Arkansas Rivers and their tribu- <br />taries, hitherto-before construction of Caddoa-made not only un- <br />available for practical use in irrigation, but damaging on account of <br />floods. . <br />The delay in the completion of the Caddoa Reservoir .because of <br />the war situation-it was not finally completed until quite recently- <br />will also explain why our negotiations could not be brought to an <br />end earlier than they were. We operated by license of the Corps of <br />Engineers, the uncompleted reservoir, beginning in 1942, with a lim- <br />ited storage capacity, limited not only by the physical situation, but <br />by the desire of the Army engineers to protect the construction. <br />We handled that situation by what were called executive interim <br />agreements between the Governors of the two States. Senator Schoep- <br />. pel was for part of that time Governor of Kansas and participated. <br />We found that they worked very well. The division of the water <br />stored involves an administration which is perhaps more complicated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.