My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05830
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:18:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8111.805
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration - Keesee Ditch
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1986
Author
HRS Engineering
Title
Keesee Ditch Change of Water Rights Vol 3 - Potential for Upstream Exchange of Kessee Ditch Water Stored in John Martin Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Transi t Losses <br /> <br />Because the point of return flows for the Keesee Ditch has been changed <br />from the stream reach adjacent to the ditch upstream to John Martin Reservoir, <br />releases to the stream to account for historical return flows will have to be <br />augmented a small amount in order to ensure delivery to the original downstream <br />location. <br /> <br />Transit losses are presently calculated by the Division Engineer using the <br />Livingston Methodl. The amount of loss is a function of river conditions and <br />varies daily. Under most conditions, the amount of transit loss assessed will <br />be less than 1.0% of the release amount up to a maximum of about 4.0%. <br />Therefore, the average annual return flow obligation of 1,487 acre-feet must <br />be supplemented by an additional 15 to 60 acre-feet in order to effect downstream <br />delivery at the historical point of return. The amount of water to be exchanged <br />upstream would be reduced accordingly. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Livingston, Russel K., 1978, Transit Losses and Traveltimes of Reservoir <br />Releases Along the Arkansas River from Pueblo Reservoir to John Martin <br />Reservoir, Southeastern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources <br />Investigations 78-75. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.