Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ..'.... <br />'.:._;."J <br />". -:''!' <br /> Number <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br />.' .. , 17 <br />,.:" <br /> 18 <br /> 19 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 29 <br /> 30 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Uinta Basin Unit existing irrigation systems <br />investigated for possible canal lining. . . 7 <br />Numeric criteria for the Lower Colorado River 12 <br />Mean annual salinity at Imperial Dam. . . 13 <br />Annual preproject water and salt budget . 14 <br />Canals and laterals to be lined under the <br />recommended plan. . . . . . . . . . . . 20 <br />Lengths and capacities of canals to be lined. 21 <br />Right-of-way acreage needed for recommended plan. 25 <br />Estimated construction c08tS. . . . . . . . . . 27 <br />Annual operation, maintenance, and replacement <br />costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 <br />Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis . . 35 <br />Cost allocation and repayment . . . . . . . 35 <br />Estimated salt load contribution under the <br />no-action alternative . . . . . . . . . . 37 <br />Summary comparison of recommended pl8n and <br />no-action alternative . . . . 39 <br />Salt removal benefits . . . . . 41 <br />Beneficial and adverse effects. 43 <br />Environmental Quality Account 44 <br />Regional economic development analysis of the <br />recommended plan. . . . . . . . . . . . 46 <br />Social Effects Account for Duchesne County. . 46 <br />Additional increments considered for the recom- <br />mended plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 <br />Estimated vegetation losses associated with canal <br /> <br />lining. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />Common nongame birds and their habitat in the <br />Uinta Basin Unit area . . . . . . . . . . . 60 <br />Unemployment percentages for Duchesne County <br />and the State of Utah . . . . . . . . . . . 69 <br />Average monthly wage of nonagricultural employees <br />in recent years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 69 <br />Population projections for Duchesne County with <br />and without the recommended plan. . . . . 71 <br />Estimated direct employment and income from <br />recommended plan. . . . . . . .. . . 71 <br />Projected school-age population for selected <br />year, no-action alternative. . . . . . . 73 <br />Projected medical personnel and facilities <br />required for selected year8, no-action <br />alternative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 <br />Projected demand for housing units in Duchesne <br />County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 <br />Developments included in cumulative impact <br /> <br />analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 <br />Summary of annual gross crop values from develop- <br />ments constructed or under construction . . . . 81 <br /> <br />OoJC415 <br /> <br />vi <br />