Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002~J8 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />tiny fish. The committee voted against an <br />exemption for the Tellico Dam, which was <br />laler completed despite opposition when <br />snail daners were found in other habitat. <br />Soon thereafter, however, the ESC did <br />exempt one project important to the Pick- <br />Sloan region: Grayrocks Dam. On the <br />Platte River in Wyoming, Grayrocks was <br />to provide a source of cooling water for the <br />Laramie River Station (LRS). Opponents <br />of the project, including the National <br />Wildlife Federation and the State of <br />Nebraska, contended that construction of <br />the dam would impound water required to <br />maintain critical habital for the endangered <br />whooping crane in Nebraska. In an <br />unprecedented move, a federal judge in <br />Nebraska enjoined the REA loan guarantee <br />for LRS, and prohibited the Corps of Engi- <br />neers from issuing the necessary 404 per- <br />mit, effectively halting all work on the pro- <br />jecl for months. <br />Panicipants in the Missouri Basin <br />Power Project (MBPPl received a stay of <br />the federal court's injunction. Subsequent- <br />ly, a negotiating team reached a settlement <br />with the plaintiffs that created the Whoop- <br />ing Crane Trost, funded through a contri- <br />bUlion of more than $7 million from the <br />MBPP. The Endangered Species Commit- <br />tee voted an exemption for Grayrocks <br />based on the setllement. <br />Until this past summer, when the ESC <br />voted to allow logging in certain areas of <br />nalional forest thaI include habilat of the <br />endangered northern spotted owl, the ESC <br />had granted no exemption for any action <br />since the Grayrocks case. <br /> <br />Hydro Hurdles <br /> <br />The Tellico Dam case foreshadowed <br />some of the hurdles hydroeleclric projects <br />would face in the future due to the ESA. <br />Federal power customers throughout the <br /> <br />country have felt the impact-and will <br />probably feel it more intensely in the <br />future-as the operations of hydroelectric <br />facilities are further curtailed or altered in <br />the interests of fish, birds and plants. <br />Hydro operations are being blamed for fish <br />kills, inundation of shore bird nests, <br />destruction of habitat and rare plants, and <br />changing the ecology of rivers so that <br />entire species are endangered and other <br />types of fish predominate. <br />In the Pacific Northwest, severnl vari- <br /> <br />In detennining whether to <br />list a species, the Secretary <br />is specifically prohibited <br />from considering the <br />possible economic effects <br />of such a listing; <br />the designation is required <br />to be based entirely on <br />the best available <br />scientific data. <br /> <br />eties of salmon have been listed and their <br />recovery plans focus largely on changes in <br />the operntion of Bonneville Power Admin- <br />istration and other dams. Despite the <br />installation of fish ladders to help salmon <br />reach their spawning grounds, and other <br />efforts to minimize affects on the fish pop- <br />ulations in the Columbia Basin, BPA is <br />under continuing pressure to change opera- <br />tions at its hydroelectric facilities. <br />There is no doubt that salmon runs are <br />down significantly from previous years, . <br />when as many as 16 million wild salmon <br />would return to their spawning grounds in <br />the Columbia River basin. Now, a run may <br />number just two million fish. Dams do <br />introduce major obstacles to the movement <br /> <br />of fish populations in rivers. But BPA cus- <br />tomers say recovery plans for Northwest <br />salmon do not provide a broad enough <br />view of the many factors that can affect <br />salmon, such as open-ocean harvesting of <br />fish by other nations, and they fear that <br />after a decade in which BPA has spent <br />approximately $1 billion on fish and <br />wildlife, they will be targeted to pay the <br />bill for recovery plans that may not work. <br />Consequently, the Pacific Northwest <br />Generating Cooperative (PNGC), the Pub- <br />lic Power Council and others have inter- <br />vened in lawsuits challenging the North- <br />west Power Planning Council's fish and <br />wildlife plan, and have filed a Notice of <br />Intent to sue NMFS, BPA and other agen- <br />cies over recovery plans for salmon. <br />PNGC contends that the federn! agencies <br />have nol taken adequate steps to consider <br />commercial harvesting, hatchery opera- <br />tions and habitat management in the plans <br />they have developed, and that they should <br />consider the salmon's entire life cycle and <br />all causes of fish kills. <br />In Pick-Sloan, the operations of the <br />Missouri mainstem dams muSl be altered <br />during the summer months to avoid <br />destroying Ihe nests of the endangered pip- <br />ing plover and interior least tern, which . <br />nest on the river's sandbars and banks. To <br />try to protect the birds withoUl completely <br />compromising releases for other project <br />purposes, including power generation, the <br />Corps of Engineers increases releases <br />every third day during the early pan ofthe <br />nesting season to encourage the birds to <br />nest al higher levels. Then, when water <br />must be released, the high river stages <br />won't inundate and destroy the nests. The <br />operational changes have reduced power <br />production by about 140 megawatts on the <br />Pick-Sloan mainstem system. <br />Also listed in the Pick-Sloan region is <br /> <br />continued on ptlge 6 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mid-West Reporter <br /> <br />Fall 1992 <br />