My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05791
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05791
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:17:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/6/1990
Author
Natural Resources La
Title
Background Documents and Information 1991 - Discussion Papers on Irrigation Water Supply Organizations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001060 <br /> <br />A: Yes. The encouragement of water conservation by water districts is a subject that touches <br /> <br />more than water policy. It goes to other issues we are discussing at this meeting, in particular, <br /> <br />issues of governance of the districts and values that westerners place in water. These are <br /> <br />beyond this paper. Nonetheless, I can summarize a few steps that all levels of government <br /> <br />might take that would appear to promote efficient conservation short of reaching the bigger <br />issues. In summary fashion, they are: <br /> <br />1. I would start, first, with clarifications to state policy. States should consider clarifying <br /> <br /> <br />their water law to assure that conservation and transfer of agricultural water (at least by the <br /> <br /> <br />districts) is a beneficial use, subject to limitations to avoid environmental damage (such as <br /> <br /> <br />cutting down phreatophytes, drying up wetlands etc.). Transfers of conserved water should be <br /> <br /> <br />lawful, as long as no other water rights' holder is injured. And any forfeiture or abandonment <br /> <br /> <br />provisions in state law that might render district or farmers vulnerable to the loss of water <br /> <br /> <br />rights upon conservation should be set aside. In addition, states might attempt to overcome <br /> <br /> <br />institutional resistance to conservation by requiring districts that are political'subdivisions of the <br /> <br /> <br />state to review their policies to ascertain whether they unnecessarily discourage conservation. <br /> <br /> <br />(This step would be politically difficult in many western states.) Finally, states might entertain <br /> <br /> <br />the notion of guiding municipalities seeking to augment water supplies through transfers of <br /> <br /> <br />agricultural water to look to conserved water rather than wholesale purchases of water rights <br /> <br /> <br />which dry up whole areas. <br /> <br />2 Districts should consider the use of inverted block rate structures for the sale of <br /> <br /> <br />water to their farmers. Focusing on rate structures rather than rates is a way to send a price <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.