My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05781
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:16:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
4/1/1994
Author
Robin Abell
Title
San Juan River Basin - Water Quality and Contaminants Review - Volume I - April 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 14 (cant.): Metal parameters for designated uses, Colorado (in pg/l) <br /> <br />(~) Metals for aquatic life use BrB stated as dissolved unless otherwise specified. <br /> <br />(2) Metals for agricultural and domestic usas are stated as total recoverable unless otherwise specified. <br /> <br />(3) Hardness values to be used in equations are in mg/l as :caloium carbonate. The hardness values used in <br />caloulating the appropriate metal standard should be based on the lower 95 percent oonfidence limit of the mean <br />hardness value at the periodic low flow oriteria as determined from a regression analysis of site-specific data. <br />Where insufficient site-specific data exists to define the mean hardness value at the periodic low flow criteria, <br />representative regional data shall be used to perform the r~gression analysis. Where a regressIon analysis is not <br />appropriate, a site-speoifio method should be used. In oalculating a hardness value, regression analyses should not <br />be extrapolated past the point that data exist. ' <br /> <br />(4) Both aoute and ohronio numbers adopted as stream st~ndards are levels not to be exoeeded more than onoe <br />every three years on the average. <br /> <br />(5) Unless the stability of the ohromium valenoe state In reoeiving waters can be clearly demonstrated, the <br />standard for chromium should be in terms of chromium VI.: In no oase can the sum of the instream levels of <br />Hexavalent and Trivalent Chromium exceed the water supply standard of 50 pg/l total chromium In those waters <br />classified for domestic water use. <br /> <br />(6) FRV means Final Residue Value and should be express~d as "Total" beoause many forms of mercury are readily <br />converted to toxic forms under natural conditions. The FRY value of 0.01 pg/l is the maximum allowed <br />ooncentration of total mercury in the water that will preserh biooonoentratlon or bioaoournulation of methylmercury <br />in edible fish tissue at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) action level of 1 ppm. The FDA aotion level <br />is' intended to protect the average consumer of commercial fish; it is not stratified for sensitive populations who <br />may regularly eat fish. <br /> <br />A 1990 health risk assessment oonduoted by the Colorado Department of Health indioates that when sensitive <br />subpopulations are oonsidered, methylmercury levels, in sport-caught fish as much as one-fifth lower (0.2 ppm) <br />t~an the FDA level may pose a health risk. <br /> <br />In waters supporting populations of fish or shellfish with a :potential for human oonsumption, the Commission can <br />a<;topt the FRV as the stream standard to be applied as a 3~-day average. Alternatively. the Commission can adopt <br />site-specific ambient based standards for mercury in accordance with Section 3.1.7(1 Hb)(ii) and (iii). When this <br />option is selected by a proponent for a particular segment, iinformation must be presented that -(1) ambient water <br />concentrations of total mercury are detectable and exceed lthe FRV, (2) that there are deteotable levels of mercury <br />in: the proponent's disoharge and that are contributing to the ambient levels and (3) that conoentratlons of <br />methylmeroury in the fish exposed to these ambient levels _do not exceed the maximum levels suggested in the <br />CDH Health Advisory for sensitive populations of humans. Alternatively or in addition the proponent may submit <br />information showing that human consumption of fish from,the particular segment is not ocourring at a level whioh <br />poses a risk to the general population andlor sensitive populations. <br /> <br />Taken from Colorado Water Quality Control Commission 1 ~93a <br /> <br />50' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.