My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05781
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:16:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
4/1/1994
Author
Robin Abell
Title
San Juan River Basin - Water Quality and Contaminants Review - Volume I - April 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OlJZ::l~j <br /> <br />4.3.1 EPA Water Quality Standards <br /> <br />The San Juan Rivei sample also included a black bullhead (Ameiurus melas) with a papilloma, a type of <br />skin lesion, that showed an unusual number of mucous cells. Papillomas are rare in this species, and the <br />condition has been reported to be related to water quality. Conversely, papillomas have been found on <br />brown bullheads (Ameiurus natalis) from apparently clean water (Herman 1991a). <br />The remaining fish disease data from the San Juan River basin comes from the lower Animas <br />River. In July 1992 the Colorado Department of Wildlife (CDOW), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BR), <br />the FWS, and the Southern Ute Tribe conducted an electrofishing survey of the Animas from the Purple <br />Cliffs area, four miles south of Durango, to the New Mexico state line (Japhet 1993). Diseased bluehead, <br />flannelmouth, and bluehead x white hybrid suckers were first sighted approximately 0.3 miles upstream <br />of a large natural gas well located within 300 feet of the river high water line at T3 3N, R1 OW, S36 (Figure <br />9) (Walker 1992, Japhet 1993). Two of the fish had large tumors protruding from their bodies, and an <br />estimated 5% of the suckers had large lesions, ulcers, and open sores (Japhet 1993). That percentage can <br />be considered to represent a major feral fish disease outbreak (Walker 1992, Japhet 1993). <br />Pete Walker, a CDOW fish pathologist, examined the aforementioned fish and reported that he <br />suspected Aeromonas salmonicida nova, a bacteria, of causing furunculosis (Walker 1992). Furunculosis <br />is a stress-mediated disease arising in poor water quality. Because the affected fish were found only in the <br />inunediate vicinity of the gas well, there is strong evidence to support that water quality indirectly caused <br />the outbreak of furunculosis (Walker 1992). <br />Following the diagnosis of furunculosis, an additional nine suckers were collected from the <br />Animas River near Bondad, Colorado. Five of the fish had open sores or lesions, while the remaining four <br />had no external signs of disease. When tested, the five fish with lesions and two without showed evidence <br />of exposure to P AHs (Japhet 1993). <br />The above-mentioned studies represent all disease research that has been performed on San Juan <br />River basin fish. With the exception of the hepato-histological investigations and the P AH analyses, the <br />studies have relied on external ell:pressions of disease, which were the most obvious clues of contamination. <br />When such clues have not been available, researchers have often compared tissue, food item, water, or <br />sediment concentrations of a given contaminant with criteria derived from toxicity studies. <br /> <br />4.3. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS <br /> <br />4.3.1 EPA WATER QUALITY STANDARDS <br />Once sampling data have been generated, researchers must decide to which standards the <br />numbers should be compared. When evaluating water quality data, many researchers look to the criteria <br />set by the Enviromnental Protection Agency (EP A); these standards are officially published in the Federal <br />Register. These standards are often considered high, especially for sensitive species, but in the absence <br />of better standards for certain contaminants they are generally used. Below are the EP A criteria for a <br />number of common parameters, trace elements, and organics. All EP A criteria, except where otherwise <br />stated, are from the I July 1993 edition of the Federal Register (Table 3) (Office of the Federal Register <br />1993). . <br /> <br />Alkalinity - The EP A criterion for freshwater aquatic life is a minimum of20 mgll as CaCo, <br />except where natural concentrations are less. <br /> <br />Ammonia - The EP A found that acute toxicity of ammonia for 29 species of freshwater fish <br />from 9 farni1ies and 18 genera was 0.083-1.09 mgll NH,. The 96-hour LCso (concentration that resnlted <br />in death of half the test population over the course of 96 hours) was 0.083-1.09 mgll for salmonids and <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />.... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.