My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05771
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05771
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:48 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8583
Description
Rio Grande Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/2002
Author
Agro Engineering Inc
Title
Impacts On Vegetation From Groundwater Pumping 2001 Evaluation San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Division Executive Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />'::-A <br /> <br />;' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />00247 'f <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON VEGETATION FROM GROUNDWATER PUMPING, <br />2001 Evaluation <br />SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CLOSED BASIN DIVISION <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />AgI'o Engineering, Inc. (Agro) has evaluated and monitored vegetation changes in the <br />San Luis Valley Project, Closed Basin Division (Project) encompassing a time period <br />from before Project pumping began (1984-85) until the present. This evaluation has <br />utilized a combination of two approaches; ground sampling and remote sensing. <br />Ground sampling of both biomass and vegetative cover at key locations has been <br />essential in identifying and assigning values to the changes that are seen on the micro- <br />scale at specific locations. While transect monitoring provides a quantitative record of <br />these changes, photographic monitoring provides a qualitative, visual record of these <br />changes. Ground sampling also makes it possible to quantify the changes that are <br />observed on the macro-scale for the entire project area using remote sensing <br />techniques and verifies the causes for change that are detected using remote sensing <br />techniques. Remote sensing has utilized LANDSAT satellite data to compute <br />vegetation indices and semi-quantitatively monitor vegetation changes (both biomass <br />and percent cover) over the wider project area. <br /> <br />Precipitation for 2001 was approximately 11 inches. This was the year with the most <br />precipitation ever studied and was considerably higher than 1984 (6% inches), 1985 (9 <br />inches) and 2000 (4 inches). In 2001, the runoff was 96% of normal due to a snow <br />pack that was 99% of average. The runoff in 2001 peaked in May rather than June. <br />The higher precipitation and runoff resulted in more exposed water area than in 2000. <br />In 2001, water covered a total of 2,515 acres, representing more than twice the acreage <br />of water present in 2000. This water level was not as high as might have been <br />expected from the abnormally high precipitation and average runoff, but indicates that a <br />large amount of the available water supply went to replenish the low antecedent soil <br />moisture left after a vei'Y di'Y year in 2000 and was also utilized by the vegetation within <br />the project. Most of the water within the pmject ai'ea in 2001 was shallow and <br />palusti'ine. <br /> <br />Vegetation within the Pmject area is largely driven by precipitation. The higher than <br />normal precipitation in 2001 was reflected in the vegetation. The mean project NDVI <br />was up 24% from the Pre-project baseline. Of the seven areas where NDVI decreases <br />from the baseline have been previously documented, Areas D, E and G are visible in <br />2001. Most of these declines are a function of irrigation management on neighboring <br />ranches, The areas where pumping may be affecting vegetation still include Area A <br />and Area E. In 2001, Area A showed very little area with a decrease in vegetation and <br />the majority of the area was positively effected by the higher than normal precipitation. <br />Area E shows a small area of decrease in vegetation in the upper portion of Stage 4. <br />Most of the effected area along the streams is related to irrigation management on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.