Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />'::-A <br /> <br />;' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />00247 'f <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON VEGETATION FROM GROUNDWATER PUMPING, <br />2001 Evaluation <br />SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CLOSED BASIN DIVISION <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />AgI'o Engineering, Inc. (Agro) has evaluated and monitored vegetation changes in the <br />San Luis Valley Project, Closed Basin Division (Project) encompassing a time period <br />from before Project pumping began (1984-85) until the present. This evaluation has <br />utilized a combination of two approaches; ground sampling and remote sensing. <br />Ground sampling of both biomass and vegetative cover at key locations has been <br />essential in identifying and assigning values to the changes that are seen on the micro- <br />scale at specific locations. While transect monitoring provides a quantitative record of <br />these changes, photographic monitoring provides a qualitative, visual record of these <br />changes. Ground sampling also makes it possible to quantify the changes that are <br />observed on the macro-scale for the entire project area using remote sensing <br />techniques and verifies the causes for change that are detected using remote sensing <br />techniques. Remote sensing has utilized LANDSAT satellite data to compute <br />vegetation indices and semi-quantitatively monitor vegetation changes (both biomass <br />and percent cover) over the wider project area. <br /> <br />Precipitation for 2001 was approximately 11 inches. This was the year with the most <br />precipitation ever studied and was considerably higher than 1984 (6% inches), 1985 (9 <br />inches) and 2000 (4 inches). In 2001, the runoff was 96% of normal due to a snow <br />pack that was 99% of average. The runoff in 2001 peaked in May rather than June. <br />The higher precipitation and runoff resulted in more exposed water area than in 2000. <br />In 2001, water covered a total of 2,515 acres, representing more than twice the acreage <br />of water present in 2000. This water level was not as high as might have been <br />expected from the abnormally high precipitation and average runoff, but indicates that a <br />large amount of the available water supply went to replenish the low antecedent soil <br />moisture left after a vei'Y di'Y year in 2000 and was also utilized by the vegetation within <br />the project. Most of the water within the pmject ai'ea in 2001 was shallow and <br />palusti'ine. <br /> <br />Vegetation within the Pmject area is largely driven by precipitation. The higher than <br />normal precipitation in 2001 was reflected in the vegetation. The mean project NDVI <br />was up 24% from the Pre-project baseline. Of the seven areas where NDVI decreases <br />from the baseline have been previously documented, Areas D, E and G are visible in <br />2001. Most of these declines are a function of irrigation management on neighboring <br />ranches, The areas where pumping may be affecting vegetation still include Area A <br />and Area E. In 2001, Area A showed very little area with a decrease in vegetation and <br />the majority of the area was positively effected by the higher than normal precipitation. <br />Area E shows a small area of decrease in vegetation in the upper portion of Stage 4. <br />Most of the effected area along the streams is related to irrigation management on the <br />