Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />At Colorado Highway No. 17, the main channel will have a capacity <br />of 46 second-feet, a velocity of 1.63 feet per second, a .bottom <br />width of 7.0 feet, and amaxfmwn water depth of 2.4 feet, The <br />capac:itywlll gradually increase in accordance with the sources <br />of water. Near San Luis Lake, the channel will have a capacity <br />of 217 second-feet, a velocity of 1.54 feet per second, a bottom <br />width of 16.0 feet, and a .maximum water depth of 5,3 feet. These <br />capacities will provide for minor peaking of the well discharge <br />and peaking of drain and flood flows. <br /> <br />Temperature of pumped ground water has been tested at 520 F. <br />Cold nights throughout the year will prevent appreciable warming <br />of thesalvage<jwater, and I t Is estimated that maximum tempera- <br />tures In the main channel wi II be about 620 F. Ponded or Impound- <br />edwater In San Luis Lake probably will reach a maxim\.llllof ]20 F. <br />on a few days each year, <br /> <br />Historically, the water surface of San Luis Lake has varied con- <br />siderably due to drought, With an equalizing channel constructed <br />between the lake and the main channel, the water surface of San <br />Luis Lake will be controlled by the water-surface elevation In the <br />main channel, At normal discharge of water from the well field <br />Into the main channel, SCln Luis Lake wi II have a surface area of <br />about 860 acres, For brief periods of time when the main channel <br />will be f lowl ng at maximum des I gn capaci ty, the water-surface e le- <br />vatlon will Increase about 1.8 feet and the area of San Luis Lake <br />wi II increase .to 900 acres. <br /> <br />Without the Prolect <br /> <br />Due to its fluctuating water level, San Luis Lake provides fishing <br />of only ,mediocre quality. In Its present condition, the lake can <br />be expected to support .fishlng resulting In annual expenditures of <br />$9,000, <br /> <br />From the mouth of La Jara Creek to the Colorado-New Kexlco State <br />line, the Rio Grande I sa poor trout stream. Upstream diversions <br />seriously dewater the stream during the summer months. Without the <br />project, fishing .on this 22-mlle reach can be expected to result In <br />annual expenditures of $12.500. <br /> <br />C~:,>~,..J In New Mexico the 76 miles of the Rio Grande from the State line to <br />the mouth of the Rio Chamagenerally are fished quite heavily despite <br />the fact that much of the stream Is Inaccessible due to steep canyon <br />walls or the Jack of roads, Only the first 24 miles of stream are <br />not Intensively used. In that area, Inaccesslbi Iity combined with <br />low streamflows aetas a deterrent to fishing. The remaining 52- <br />mile reach receives accretions of water and is good .quallty trout <br />habitat, Fishing on the 76 miles of the Rio Grande within New Mexico <br />Is expected to result In average annual total expenditures of about <br />$190,000. <br />