Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOQ218 <br /> <br />-37- <br /> <br />(143 u.s. 621. 622); and by the act of 1885 "a joint commission was <br />orp;ani zed" (143 u. S. 621, 636); <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />\.ithout further multiplicetion of elCamp1es. it vlou1d rppcar that <br />whore two representatives of the tJnited States and of a State are duly <br />appointed for the purpose of settling a boundel'Y or some other dispute, <br />such persons 'ue "commissioners" and are co11ecti vely a "joint com- <br />mission," and as the court said (162 U.S. 76)., "Under the aot of TelCas <br />of 1882 "nd the act of Congress of 1885, tre two Governments appointed <br />commissioners," and the body so constituted was a "joint commission." <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />This exercise of the treaty-making powers 0 f the two separate <br />Governments (National and State) necessarily proceeds upon the funda- <br />mental fact that there are two separate and distinct Govern"",nts, each <br />having its attributes of sovereignty. Of this we shall make mention <br />in a separete memorandum. <br /> <br />cotlPACTS BETHEEN STl_TE J.i':D NATIOHJ.L GOV;,,,H1Q;NTS <br /> <br />Controversies arising between two Stctes or between the United <br />Strtes and a State or Stf\tea may be settled by compact or agreement <br />or by judi ci"l determination by tllfl United States Supremo Court. <br />Diplomacy failing the suit before tie court is the substitute for war, <br />In either event the high contracting or litigati'1 g pe,.ties prcceed <br />upon tie basis of sovereignties. ,"tch e:wrcising independent and <br />seprrate powers, and erch elCclusiv<> ,;ithin its proper sphere. As said <br />by Mr. Ju,tice Harlan in United States v. Texas (143 u.s. 621, 646). <br /> <br />"The submission to judicial solution of controversies <br />"rising between these tVIO Governments. 'eech scvereign with <br />respect to the objeots cOl1Unitted to it, and neither sovereign <br />with respect to the objects conunitted to the other.' jJcCulloch <br />v. state of Maryland (4 Hheat, 316. 400. 410), but both subject <br />to the supreme 1l1Yl of t he land, does no violence to the in- <br />herent wture of sovereignty. The State s c f the Union have <br />agreed, in tie Constitution. that the judici"l power of too <br />United States shall e:ctend to all cases arising under the Con- <br />stitution, lo.ws, and treaties of the United St,tes, withoot <br />regard to the ch-'lracter of too "arties (excludingl of course. <br />suits against a State by its own citizens or by citizens of <br />other Strtes, or by citizens or subjects of foreign States). <br />and egually to controversies to vlhich the United States shall <br />be a p:crty, without regrrd to the subject of such contro- <br />versies. and that this court may exercise original jurisdiction <br />in all such ceses 'in vlhich 0. State shall be p.o.rty, I without <br />excluding those in which the United St,.tes may be the opposite <br />party,. " <br />