Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, "",: <br /> <br />. ',' .~ <br />.. --, <br /> <br />,",' ~;-~ <br />. " <br /> <br />(jJJJ~tj <br /> <br />, "'\~:, <br />\':.,..,.1." <br /> <br />'... <br /> <br />the highest peak discharge from a drainage area of over 3,100 <br />square miles is 19,000 c.f.s. which occurred on 2 August 1921. <br />Most of this flow originated from Grape Creek, a right bank tribu- <br />tary immediately upstream of Canon City. The second highest <br />peak of 12,300 c.f.s. occurred on 18 August 1909. At Pueblo, <br />with a drainage area of 4,686 square miles, the peak discharge <br />for 79 years of record is 103,000 c.f.s. which occurreu on <br />J June 1921. The record further shows thst there was a peak <br />discharge of 30,000 c.f.s. an S August 1902; 25,600 c.f.s. on <br />12 July 1923; and 19 other discharges over 10,000 c.f.s. Table <br />4-5 shows the monthly and annual flow in acre-feet for the inflow <br />gsge at Pueblo Dam and Reservoir located on Arkansas River near <br />Portland, Colorado. Table 4-6 shows the monthly and annual flow <br />in ac~e-feet for the outflow gage located 0.4 mile downstream <br />of the dam. Table 4-7 tabulates the inflow volume-frequency <br />values at Pueblo Dam. Table 4-8 is the estimated monthly and <br />annual flows in acre-feet at the Pueblo Dam for the period 1895 <br />to 1973 and includes transmountain diversions. Plates 4-3 <br />through 4-7 presents the inflow hydro graph to Pueblo Reservoir for <br />the period 1913 to 1970. Plate 4-8 shows the flow duration curve <br />for Pueblo Reservoir for the period 1941 to 1975. <br /> <br />~, 'c <br />," ~ <br />':~:.';" ...~,; <br />":~:'.~~~.:: <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />,,.. <br />,~: , <br />"},,;' <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />4-05. Channel and Floodway Characteristics. Channel capaci- <br />ties in the reach from Pueblo to John Martin Dam show the effects <br />of depletion of flows. Downstream from the Pueblo Floodwsy, the <br />channel capacities, as determined by backwater studies, sre: <br />below Pueblo Floodway and Levee Extension 5,000 c.f.s.; at Avon- <br />dale 6,600 c.f.s.; at Nepesta B,200 c.f.s.; at La Junta lO,200 <br />c.f.s.; and at Las Animas 6,500 c.f.s. In general, channel <br />capacities increase from Pueblo to La Junta and decrease from <br />La Junta to Las Animas. The decrease can be attributed to the <br />numerous diversions and the absence of major uncontrolled tribu- <br />taries entering the main stem to contribute the volume and <br />moderatelY-high flows necessary to prevent aggradation. The <br />uamages occurring on the Arkansas River in the reach between <br />Pueblo and John Martin Dams are the results of inundation of <br />agricultural land. However, losses are also encountered on <br />low-lying unprotected urban areas. The travel time from Pueblo <br />to John Hartin is between 3S and 62 hours. A simplified disgram <br />showing travel time is presented on Plate 4-9. Discharge rating <br />curves for stream-gaging stations near Portland, above Pueblo, <br />and near Avondale, are presented on Plates 4-l0, 4-1l, and 4-l2, <br />respectively. Other discharge rating curves can bs found in <br />the Hoster Regulation Manual on Plates 35 through 56. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />" .' <br /> <br />,..; <br /> <br />..." <br /> <br />,.' '.- <br /> <br />. ,~ <br /> <br />~-06. Upstream Structures. <br />structures above Pueblo Dam. <br /> <br />There are no flood control <br />However, there are structures for <br /> <br />.'1 <br />I <br />; I <br /> <br />....:". <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />....-,-, <br /> <br />4-10 <br /> <br />,.', ':!'-~": <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />~., <br /> <br /> <br />,.' <br /> <br /> <br />; I <br /> <br />.,' ....\>~~:~t.,}::}~~::.::<" , ,.', <br /> <br />" :'~. <br />