Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> 200.000 <br /> 175.000 f j <br />>- 150.000 , ) <br />w I: . <br />i:' 125.000 It ' . <br /> . <br /> 10 , <br /> 1- , . <br />w 75.000 ,> <br /><r ; <br />u 50.000 <br /><l <br /> 25.000 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />o ~ i~~~~ <br />1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 <br />RELATION 8ETWEEN ACTUAL AND DESIRED WATER SUPPLY ON THE SOUTH PLATTE RIVER IN DISTRICT NO I. <br />ASSUME 1926 AS AN IDEAL WATER YEAR; THEN YELl)W INDICATES THE FLOW AT KERSEY UP TO 1926 SUPPLY <br />BLUE INDICATES THE SURPLUS OVER 1926 SUPPLY AND RED INDICATES THE DEFICIENCY UNDER THE 1926 SUPPLY <br />t;; 200.00 <br />w <br />"- 100.0 <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />!zoo <br />t! 6 <br /><r 4 <br />w <br />Q. 20 <br /> <br />o 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 <br />YELLOW INO/CATES PER CENT OF ADEQUATE SUPP~Y AT KERSEY USING 1926 SUPPLY AS 100'7.. RED <br />INDICATES PER CENT DEFICIENCY. BROWN INDICATE~ PER CENT DISCHARGE FROM DISTRICT I AT BALZAC. <br />USING 1926 SUPPLY AT KERSEY AS 100 % . I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />o <br />