Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COST ALLOCATIONS <br /> <br />Alte~native Single-purpose Costs <br /> <br />The alternative single-purpose ir~'igati:m costs of the Colorado River <br />Storage project were estimated as the costs of providing replacellient stor- <br />age for irrigation and other upstreao water-consuming uses equivalent to <br />that at the Glen Canyon, Fla~ing Gorge, Curecanti, and Navajo units. <br /> <br />After allowances are made for sediment deposition to year 2062 and <br />minimum operating levels for power production, the multiple-purpose reser- <br />voirs at Glen Canyon, Flaming Gm'ge, Curecanti, and Navajo units wi,ll ha'fe <br />about 22,443,000 acre-feet of active storaGe cap~city. 'Ele sinGle-purpose <br />alternative must ha'fe an equivalent umocnt of active storage capacity, with- <br />out any specific r<,sel'vation of dead storage "co maintain a m~niraum po;,rer <br />pool, after making allmrances for evap':ll'ation lo,;ses and sediment deposi- <br />tion to year 2062. The lowest cost single-purpose alternative was found <br />to consist of the Cross Mountain, Flaming Gorge, Dewey, and Navajo TIeser- <br />voirs. To assure the initial filling of such al ternati ve reservoirs dur- <br />ing the present ?eriod of incomplete water use in the ColoraJD River Basin, <br />they ,~uld need to be constructed under the same schedule as the author- <br />ized multiple-I'urpose rese~voi!'s. <br /> <br />The lowest cost single-purpose re~lacement sto~age alternative was <br />selectei by reconnaissance analyses using available data on the va.'ious <br />large rese~voir sites in the upper basin. The estimated capacities and <br />construction costs of the selected alternative system of reservoirs are <br />shown in the table en the following paGe. <br /> <br />Justifiable power expenditure <br /> <br />The justifiable expenGiture for power is taken as the cost of the most <br />economica\ single-purpose alternative power development described on page <br />29. As previously explained, this ~arne coet is twten as a measure of the <br />project power benefit. The total annual costs of the alternative d~velop- <br />ment were estimated en the baais of private financing including taxes and <br />interest at the rate of 6 1/4 peroellt, The estim3'i;eCl costs are summarized <br />below. <br /> <br />Itam <br />Cost excluding taxes <br />Taxes <br />Tc":.al <br />Y Computed over a <br />2 1/2 percent. <br /> <br />AveraGe annual <br />equi valent <br />of total cost <br />$31,583,000 <br />8,806,000 <br />40,389,000 <br />100-Year period with <br /> <br />Present <br />wortJi}} <br />$1,156, 3eO, 000 <br />322,423,000 <br />1,478,803,000 <br />interest at rate of <br /> <br />Justifiable flood control expend1":.ure <br /> <br />Flood control benefits, as estimated by the Corps of Engineers, were <br />used as the justifiable flood oontrol expenditure. These have been <br /> <br />39 <br />