Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br /> Ben.tit-collt CCIIIlpar1Bon for Colorado River stora,e project and partjcipat1ng projects <br /> (5~year period of anal,y8i8 with :2 1 :2 percent interest rate) <br /> CUnlt-Sl.OOO) <br /> Economic COlto I <br /> Investment Annual <br /> Conatruc- t~ I <br /> lion costll revenues <br /> exclusive Interest Annual Aeaigned foregone <br /> o! centrib- during operation, annual because Tot.al Annual beneI1tll I <br /> uted fundI! con!ltroc- Annual ma1nte- costs of of public annual Municipal Pleh <br /> and costs of lion a.t equiva.- nance, and replace- power equiva- ~d and : Sedlmen- Benefit-cost ratioll <br /> pal!lt 1nVe8- :2 1/2 l~t replace- ment !nv.at- lent lrr bat.ionY 1nduBtrlal Flood wild- Reer.a- lation Direct Total <br /> Unitll and pro1ecte ti.a:a.tionll percent Total of tothl ment cOBte lltoralta!! ment COllts Direct Indirect Public Total POOllor water control life lion control Total benefits benefits <br /> Storage unitl J/ 32,866 6,885 .35,887 <br /> Glen Cat\1'On 486,055 17,137 3,994 28,016 3,930 31.957 1..3:1 <br /> Flllllling Gorge 4.796 82,026 2,892 550 824 4,266 1,170 3,559 4,721 1.1:1 <br /> Navajo 2.403 4J.,937 1,584 25 1,609 !J;I1,4oo )1 1)0 1,561 1.0:1 <br /> Curecanti 6 10 2 10 6 1 216 8 212 68 86 81 1.0:1 <br />Subtotal 44 7 9 71 2 2 2 2 8925 9 7 712 41199 1 21 4 15' 1.2:1 <br />. Participatin8 project. <br />Paonia, Colo. 7.571 2B9 7.860 277 2) 20 )20 ))5 ))6 671 2 4 ) 660 1.1:1 2.2:1 <br />Pine River extension. <br /> Colo. and N. Hex. 5.384 )59 5.743 202 21 56 279 244 207 124 575 -2 57) .9:1 2.1:1 <br /> Smith Fork. Colo. 3.416 141 3.557 125 12 16 15) 110 45 155 ) 15' .7:1 1.0:1 <br /> florida. Colo. 7.334 )14 7.648 270 16 26 )12 178 1)4 45 )57 6 6 )69 .6:1 1.2:1 <br /> Silt. Colo. 3.463 1)4 3.597 127 12 '2 151 114 76 17 2rY/ 2 209 .8:1 1.l.:1 <br /> H9mIIIOnd, N. Hex. 2,263 62 2,.325 82 18 ,8 "' 102 9) )2 227 227 .9:1 1.9:1 <br /> Central Utah (initial <br /> phalle), Utah .2/228,391 ll..384 239.775 8,454 1.040 )78 502 10,.374 2,165 1,255 909 4.329 2,423 1,437 85 428 2 8.704 .6:1 .8:1 <br /> Etaery Count,.. Utah 9.871 297 10,168 )59 40 )2 4)1 282 12) 42 447 -1 4' 494 .8:1 1.1:1 <br /> Seedllk&dee, W:ro. 24,760 1,230 25.990 916 ") 220 1,319 69. 721 )5. 1.769 -10 1.759 .5:1 1.3:1 <br /> L7JlB.Il. W:ro. ll.323 475 1l.798 416 62 478 2" 77 )7 )95 -. )91 .6:1 .8:1 <br /> La Barge. "70. 1 0 1 , 6 20 28 111 8 10 2 2 .8:1 2.1:1 <br />SUbtotal 1 202 II 2 1 1 02 1 0 8 1 1 1 0 2 1 7 2 2 1 9 . :1 1.0:1 <br />Total 8 2 108 1 661 6 8 806 08 8 2 1 1 1 60 160 812 1 12 6 a 2 61 1.1:1 <br /> 1 Eltimated at per acr....root or increaaed etream depletion. <br /> y. No adjulrt&ent made tor developllent period. <br /> ~ Cosh ot Tranllll1laion division haTe been pror8.ted among the unite or the atorage project. INTEllOI . .unAMATIOI'I. St.( UTAH <br /> Benent. trOlll the Navajo Indian irrigation project. haye been aSlligned t.o the Navajo unit. in the proportion <br /> that the co lit ot t.he Navajo Reservoir bears to t.he t.otal cost of the Navajo project. including Navajo Reservoir. <br /> ~ Storage benetite assignable t.o fut.ure participating proJech. <br /> W Excludes Is,750.lXlO tor construction or certain Central Utah project teaturee to ultimate phase capacit,.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />34 <br />