Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Ou2583 <br /> <br />130C for September and 20C for December were assumed and were based on average <br />yearly harmonic-mean water temperatures for Steamboat Springs (T. D. Steele, <br />written commun., 1977). The regional treatment-plant discharge was based on <br />projected population and 134 gal (0.509 m3) per capita per day for the plant' <br />location (see page 40) 188 river-miles (303 km) upstream from the,mouth. <br /> <br />The computed profiles for CBODU are shown on figure 28 and for DO on <br />figure 29. The profile patterns were distinct for the September and December <br />conditions. The effects of flow augmentation were negligible in both <br />instances. The simulated DO profiles indicated only a slight DO, sag <br />downstream from Steamboat Springs (fig. 29). The differences ,between the <br />September and December DO profiles can be attributed to the different water- <br />temperature conditions. The sharp increase of DO on the December profile at <br />the start of the curve is a result of an assumed 8.5-mg/L initial <br />concentration, much below the saturated DO concentration. <br /> <br />The nutrient species modeled included ammonia nitrogen (fig. 30), total <br />nitrogen (fig. 31), and orthophosphate (fig, 32). The profiles for ammonia- <br />nitrogen and orthophosphate concentrations indicate that large differences <br />between September and December seasonal conditions and the effects of <br />augmented flow conditions are discernible. The ammonia-nitrogen <br />concentrations in the Yampa River for the two periods were computed assuming <br />the treatment-plant effluent contained 9.0 mg/L ammonia nitrogen, the proposed <br />standard for December 1978; and 2.8 mg/L, the proposed standard for September <br />1978 (table 5). For each of the four conditions modeled, the maximum <br />concentrations of ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, and, orthophosphate <br />occurred downstream from the proposed regional wastewater-treatment plant to <br />the confluence of the Elk River in December. The profiles of nonionized <br />ammonia-nitrogen concentrations for the four assumed conditions are shown on <br />figure 33. The concentrations of nonionized ammonia nitrogen shown of the two <br />profiles for the augmented and nonaugmented flow conditions computed for <br />December exceed the proposed 0.02-mg/L concentration for a type B1 stream <br />classification with maximum concentrations of 0.042 mg/L for augmented flow <br />and 0.065 mg/L for nonaugmented flow. These concentrations will vary <br />depending on the actual water-temperature and pH values. For example, for the <br />acceptable pH range of 6 to 9 and a water temperature from 00 to 200C, the <br />nonionized ammonia-nitrogen concentration could range from 0 to 0.27 mg/L for <br />augmented flow and from 0 to 0.42 mg/L for nonaugmented flow in December. <br /> <br />The assumed ammonia-nitrogen concentration of the proposed treatment- <br />plant effluent was varied in the model to evaluate its effect on the <br />nonionized ammonia-nitrogen concentrations in the Yampa River. The results <br />for December are shown on figure 34. An ammonia-nitrogen concentration for <br />the plant effluent of 3 mg/L resulted in a maximum of 0.025 mg/L of nonionized <br />ammonia nitrogen for nonaugmented flow. The results for a flow augmentation <br />of 20 ft3/s (0.56 m3/s) in December also are shown on figure 34. An ammonia- <br />nitrogen concentration of 4 mg/L in the effluent resulted in a maximum of <br />about 0.02 mg/L of nonionized ammonia nitrogen in the study reach. The <br />analysis indicates that flow augmentation may allow an approximate 25-percent <br />increase in the permissible ammonia-nitrogen waste loading in the study reach, <br />relative to the Q7,10-flow statistics. <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />~ <br />