Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1)0'2575 <br /> <br />Flow Augmentation of Proposed Yamcolo Reservoir <br /> <br />The Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District and the Colorado Water Conser- <br />vation Board have proposed the construction of the Yamcolo Reservoir on the <br />Bear River, a tributary of the Yampa River, in Garfield County (fig. 1). An <br />engineering feasibility and operational study of the proposed reservoir was <br />conducted by Western Engineers, Inc. (1975). Of particular interest to the <br />analysis of waste-load assimilative capacity is the possibility of streamflow <br />augmentation from the Yamcolo Reservoir in the study reach of the Yampa River. <br />The operating rules of the proposed reservoir would include possible augmenta- <br />tion of flow in the Yampa River by approximately 20 ft3/s (0.6 m3/s) during <br />low-flow periods; On the basis of streamflow-data evaluation for the State of <br />Colorado (Livingston, 1970), the computed Q7,10 flow of the Yampa River at <br />Steamboat Springs was 28 ft3/s (0.78 m3/s) with a standard deviation of 27 <br />ft3/s (0.76 m3/s) and a standard error of 58 percent. The regionalized Q7,10 <br />flow estimated for tributaries flowing into the study reach should be consid- <br />ered only as fair to poor in accuracy (Livingston, 1970). The augmentation <br />from the proposed Yamcolo Reservoir could increase the Q7,10 flow in the Yampa <br />River at Steamboat Springs to 48 ft3/s (1.3 m3/s). The option of flow augmen- <br />tation of 20 ft3/s (0.6 m3/s) was used in evaluating the effects of treated <br />wastewater effluent from the proposed regional treatment plant during Septem- <br />ber and December flow conditions on the Yampa River. <br /> <br />population Projections for Steamboat Springs <br /> <br />A substantial seasQnal variation in population in the Steamboat Springs <br />area occurs each year because of summer and winter recreational activities. <br />Because of this variation, two population indexes,have been used in this <br />study: peak-day and permanent population. The peak-day population is defined <br />as the maximum daily population for a given year, and permanent population is <br />defined as the average number of year-round residents in the Steamboat Springs <br />area.. <br /> <br />Population projections and extrapolations for 2010 based on studies by <br />Gathers and Associates (1976) as revised by the Routt County Planning Commis- <br />sion and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1977) (fig. 23) were used <br />for the model-simulation phase of this study. <br /> <br />The projected population for 2010 was recommended by the Routt County <br />Planning Commission (P. E. Stark, written commun., 1976) for use in the model- <br />simulation phase of this report. The projected peak-day population for.2010 <br />is approximately 26,000 and. the projected permanent population is 11,500. <br />These population estimates were determined by extending the graphical rela- <br />tionships in figure 23 to 2010. An assumed water use of 134 gal (0.509 m3) <br />per capita per day was used in conjunction with the projected peak-day popula- <br />tion of 26,000 and a maximum-design capacity of 3.5 Mgal (13.1xl03 m3) per day <br />for the proposed wastewater-treatment plant (F. J. Vogel, written commun., <br />1975). As noted in the wastewater-facilities plan (U.S. Environmental <br /> <br />40 <br />