My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05674
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05674
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:24 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:11:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1978
Author
USGS
Title
Analysis of Waste-Load Assimilative Capacity of the Yampa River - Steamboat Springs to Hayden - Routt County - Colorado - March 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />002570 <br /> <br />first-order decay coefficients, as described by Willis, Anderson, and Dracup <br />(1975). The first coefficient relates phosphorus losses to benthos, and the <br />second coefficient relates phosphorus use to chlorophyll-a. The temperature- <br />corrected rate coefficients used in the models were 0.45 per day and 0.0' per <br />day for the first and second orthophosphate~decay rates, respectively. The <br />second coefficient relating to chloryphyll-a use was found to have little <br />effect for the model calibrations and therefore WaS neglected. <br /> <br />The calibration results of the fecal-coliform and total-coliform bacteria <br />are shown on figures 21 and 22, respectively. Considering the accuracy of the <br />coliform-bacteria determinations and the range of observed diel variations <br />(fig. 9), the modeling results give a general idea of profile variations. The <br />results from the two models for the fecal-coliform bacteria, were nearly <br />identical (fig. 21). No comparison was made for the total-coliform bacteria <br />because the Pioneer-I model did not include an algorithm for its computation. <br /> <br />One purpose of the model-calibration analysis was to evaluate the various <br />computational, algorithms in the models. A second purpose was to derive a <br />unique set of model-parameter values. As shown in the preceding discussion of <br />calibration results, some differences in the computed profiles were noted.. <br />The large scatter of the observed field data makes it difficult to derive the <br />unique set of model parameters in the calibration phase for either model. As <br />a result, calibration results are considered only fair. For the simulation <br />phase of the analysis, described later, only the U.S. Geological Survey model <br />was used. This choice was made because of previous experience with the model, <br />the ease with which it can be used, and the form of required input data. <br /> <br />FACTORS INCORPORATED INTO MODEL SIMULATIONS <br /> <br />Existing Stream-Reach Classification <br /> <br />The study reach of the Yampa Ri~from Steamboat Springs to Hayden, has <br />been classified as a cold-water-rtShery secondary-body-contact type B1 (Colo- <br />rado Department of Health, 1974). Stream-quality requirements for this <br />classification include the following: DO concentrations to equal or exceed 6 <br />mg/L, concentrations of fecal-coliform bacteria to be less than 1,000 <br />colonies/100 mL, a pH range from 6.0 to 9.0, water temperature not to exceed <br />20oC, the maximum temperature increase from ambient water temperature not to <br />exceed 1.lOC, and a recommended requirement that nonionized ammonia concentra-, <br />tions be less than or equal to 0.02 mg/L (Colorado Department of Health, <br />written commun., 1976; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976). Other <br />variables considered in the standards of the State of Colorado and U.S. <br />Environmental Protection Agency, such as taste, odor, color, and solids, are <br />not included in this analysis. <br /> <br />The nonionized ammonia concentrations are not computed directly by the <br />U.S. Geological Surveyor Pioneer-1 models; instead, they are computed <br />manually using reference tables. For the simulation phase of this study, <br />tables in a report by Willingham (1976) were used. These tables express the <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />), <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.