|
<br />,"'" ~ f' r.
<br />4~;'; ,j
<br />
<br />(
<br />~
<br />'I
<br />
<br />PLATE 3
<br />
<br />FRAMEWORK STUDY REGIONS IN PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
<br />
<br />n,
<br />: (' "
<br />III ~~Il! "
<br />.r-u". .\ I
<br />- '\.:.AOO---~.J';~ . .OC"~':;.~---'-"
<br />'\)"'''./ I ',\ .<O...,_--~
<br />, "",,,,,,,,~'i~\'''''' \...-"1
<br />
<br />v A 0 'T'" H (, <}
<br />
<br />I'" :\:" ( ,\!"~, "",,,,' c:
<br />\: I ;~ \
<br />'" \ i \ 0 c:::)
<br />" \ :'--'--~\/ \ ,,,,,,,. 'i.
<br />e", t) t- ~-:~~~tL=~)
<br />. ~~ 0' "'('
<br />", \ )
<br />';'fO'~~..p.\ZONA,o)
<br />~ ;; ""(
<br />"'" """'. (( %\; "';
<br />, ."_0'.' I:'
<br />
<br />\-"~';:?o'-~ ~: {
<br />~."o.. )
<br />"~
<br />
<br />r'"
<br />I~
<br />r'--~'."" 'r
<br />"C'~---
<br />
<br />o I
<br />l "'
<br />l~"..," '"
<br />
<br />.,0,":"'"'0 "'.
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />v
<br />
<br />c
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />0-
<br />
<br />~,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />fornia's interest in the California Region and
<br />Lower and Upper Colorado Regions. The Board
<br />staff also is an active panicipant in the Coordi-
<br />nated Planning Subcommittee.
<br />In addition to attending meetings of the sev-
<br />eral groups and committees, the Board staff re-
<br />viewed and commented on work output from
<br />the policy groups and study work groups; re-
<br />viewed and commented on study methodology
<br />and criteria; presented suggestions on procedures
<br />and criteria; and offered data from studies per-
<br />formed by the Board.
<br />The first part of 1968 was taken up by the
<br />study work groups collecting and coordinating
<br />data from the various state and federal agencies
<br />and interchanging data among the work groups.
<br />The economics work groups were especially
<br />busy in disaggregating the projections from the
<br />
<br />LEGEND
<br />CD CAliFORNIA REGION
<br />
<br />@ GREAT BASIN REGION
<br />
<br />o UPPER COLORADO REGION
<br />@ LOWER COLORADO REGION
<br />-- REGIONAL BOUNDARY LINES
<br />
<br />..
<br />,
<br />HALt'."""
<br />
<br />Office of Business Economics and Economic
<br />Research Service and in setting up an input-
<br />output model of each region's economic activi-
<br />ties. Although being interested in the activities
<br />of all of the Lower Colorado Region work
<br />groups, the Board was particularly active in the
<br />following work groups: (1) water resources,
<br />(2) municipal and industrial water requirements,
<br />(3) irrigation and drainage, (4) water quality,
<br />pollution control, and health factors, (5) eco-
<br />nomics, (6) legal and institutional environment,
<br />and (7) general program and alternatives.
<br />One of the most important items concerning
<br />the Type I Studies was the criteria and assump-
<br />tions to be adopted that would define the Colo-
<br />rado River water supply. The Board's position
<br />on Colorado River water supply was stated in
<br />the November 13, 1968, letter from the Chief
<br />
<br />19
<br />
|