My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05654
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:10:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1939
Title
Period of Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />( <br />I <br /> <br />.. .. <br /> <br />',-, <br /> <br />t. . <br />t-- <br /> <br />APPENDIX E <br /> <br />proportional share of the Compact project storage evaporation, or they <br />can be lost by azv amount of spill from Compact projeot storage. Because <br />the evaporation rate is several times greater in the vioinity of Elephant <br />Butte Reservoir than it is in the higher altitudes of the San Luis Valley <br />and beoause of the possibility of loss of credit water through spill, it <br />is advantageous for Colorado to store its water in Colorado insofar as <br />possible. <br /> <br />Colorado oan aooumulate debits to the limit of 100,000 aore-feet <br />plus additional debit oaused by holdover storage in reservoirs oonstruoted <br />after 1937 provided that, Tlithin the physioallimitations of storage oapao- <br />ity in such reservoirs, Colorado shall retain water in storage at all t;imes <br />to the extent of its acorued debit, As of .Deceaber 31, 1951, Colorado had <br />an aOln'\lEld oredit of 900 aore-feet. Although offioial oomputations have <br />not been made since 1951, unoffioial oomputations indioate that as of <br />December 31, 1954, Colorado would have an aoorued debit of 231,900 aore- <br />feet. As shown by theoomparison of the limitations on aocrued debits ard <br />the unoffioially oomputed debit as of December 31, 1954, additional stor.- <br />age would be of assistance relative to oompliance Vlith the terms of the <br />Rio Grande Compaot. As in the oase of oredits, debits ma.v also be reduced ._ <br />in several wa.vs. They oan be offset by subsequent oredits, they oan be <br />reduced by evaporation as they llIUSt bear their proportional share of <br />reservoir evaporatioIl, they can be released to Compaot projeot storage in <br />aocordance with oertain provisions of the Compact, they oan be reduoed by <br />having the unfilled capaoity. in Compact project storage beooming less than <br />the amount of the debit because the debit' cannot exceed the amount of <br />unfilled oapaoi.ty in Compact project Iltorage, or they can be oancelled by <br />spill of usable water from Compact projeot storage. AIw debit'water in <br />storage in e::::oess of the unfilled oapaoity of Compaot projeot storage <br />beoomes the property of t:lEl ovner of the reservoir storing such debit <br />waterc In the event of spill of usable 1i!lter from Compaot projeot storage, <br />all debits and credits are cancelled ani the debit water in storage becomes <br />the property of the owner of the reservoir storing such debit water. <br />Urder the last two methods by whioh debits could be reduced, it lIOuld be <br />advantageous to Colorado to hold debit water in storage to obtain owmr- <br />ship of the 1i!lter. However,caraful operation of reservoirs constructed <br />after 1937 would be required to prevent the storage capaoity from beooming <br />filled Vlith debit water to the extent that the inflO1r to the reservoir <br />could not be controlled to obtain maximum benef:l.oial use of the allowable <br />share of the basin water sup~'. <br /> <br />FLOODS <br /> <br />, . Nearl:v. all.lpE{j.o}o "rio9d1l ilitb$,&in Luis.V.a1ley have: ooencaus~tl-'. <br />.'. b1J rains'on heavy snOW". cover. RoV/evel;', in October 1911, a heavy rainfall <br />alone caused a peak discharge of 18,000 cubic feet per second at Del Norte, <br />the highest ever reoorded there. Rainfall for the three days from Octo- <br />ber 4 through 6 was 2.65 inches at Wagon ibeel Gap am 4.83 inches at <br />Cumhrea. Damage was lim1ted primarily to the area aroum Del Norte, but; <br />lam. was inurrlated to illamosa. At Del Norta the three-day volume was <br />61,500 acre-feet ani at W~son 25,200 acre-feet. . <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Eoo2:3 <br /> <br />r ....,.# j"':, I.""! <br />I.., .. .A V 'J ,) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.