My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05652
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:10:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - USGS
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1997
Author
USGS
Title
Interim Results of Quality-Control Sampling of Surface Water for the Upper Colorado River National Water - Quality Assessment Study Unit - Water Years 1995-96
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />[LoWi":\t roundmg uni! is equal 10 the magnitude of the lea.~t significant figure\ <br /> <br />Table 14. Summary 01 differences between post-processing split-replicate sam pies for general chemical constituents <br /> <br /> Percent of samples Percent of samples Percent of samples <br />Constituent within plus or minus 1 within plus or minus 2 <br /> with nO difference lowest rounding unit lowest rounding units <br />Calcium 75 100 iOO <br />Magnesium 62 100 100 <br />Sodium 75 100 100 <br />Potassium 88 100 100 <br />Sulfale 88 100 100 <br />Chloride 75 88 88 <br />FI uoride 75 100 100 <br />Laboratory alkalinity 100 100 100 <br />Silica 75 100 100 <br />Iron 25 75 88 <br />Manganese 100 100 100 <br />Laboratory pH 12 88 88 <br />Laboratory 5pecific conductance 38 75 88 <br />Residue on evaporation 29 29 43 <br /> <br />Comparison of Nutrients and Organic Carbon <br /> <br />Results of comparison between posl-processing <br />split-replicate samples for nutrients and dissolved <br />organic carbon are listed in table 15. Suspended <br />organic carbon is not included. The analysis of <br />suspended organic carbon uses all the sediment on thc <br />filter paper. These splits are obtained after processing <br />has been completed. and splitting the filter paper for <br />analysis would not be an acceptable method. A value <br />of one-half the reporting limit was substituted for <br />values less than the reporting limit (values with a <br />less than) to determine the differences between the <br /> <br />posl-processing split-replicatc samples. Shaded cells <br />in table 15 represem differences greater than plus or <br />minus \ rounding unit. The pattern of shaded cells <br />indicates Ihat the larger differences are not related 10 <br />sampling site or constituent concentration. A summary <br />of Ihe differences between the post-processing split- <br />replicate samples for the constituents in table 15 is <br />given in table 16. The majority of the differences <br />agree within plus or minus I lowest rounding unit. <br />Variability associated with sample shipment and <br />analysis for nutrients and organic carbon is low and <br />will have little effect on interpretation of environ- <br />mental data. <br /> <br />28 Interim Results of Quality.control Sampling of Surlace Water for the Upper Colorado River National Water.Ouality <br />Assessment Study Unit, Water Years 1995-96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.