Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0> Table 4. Comparison of environmental and pre-processing split-replicate samples for general chemical constituents-Continued <br />,.- (En\'" tnVtr0nmental sample; Split. pre-procesSIng ~pllt-repli(:ttte ~ample: DiCf. I. difference in urub o(consllluenl: Diff. 2, difference in lowest roundmg uni\; mgfL, milligrams per tiler; ~g/L mICrograms <br />..a <br />" m p~r liter; ~Slclll. mlcrosiemt"ns per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; shaded cell~ represenl difft"rences grealer lh<Ul plus or minus I Jowe~l rounding unit; lowest rounding unit is equal [0 lhe magnilUde of <br />m::!. <br />l: 3 the It-asl significant figure! <br />3'" <br />m m <br />" " <br />-<: Silica Iron Manganese <br />VI" <br />-" <br /><: 0 Station Date Env. Split Diff.1 Env. Split Dill. 1 Env. Split Dill. 1 <br />0.- Dill. 2 Dill. 2 Dill. 2 <br />"'0 (mgIL) (mgIL) (mgIL) (~gIL) (~g/L) (~gIL) (~g/L) (~gIL) (~g/L) <br />c:c <br />::!.!! Gunnison near 090596 i3 \3 0 0 3 3 0 0 IS 14 I <br />~~ <br />::Eh Grand Junction <br />lto Gore 102495 5,4 5.4 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 <br />m " <br />~ - <br />-<~ Uncompahgre 072596 10 10 0 0 3 3 0 0 46 50 -4 -4 <br />m~ <br />lOen French 090996 9.5 9.4 0.1 1 11 15 ..4 -4 10 10 0 0 <br />~ .. <br />~3 <br />:g-g Dry 08~996 ~o 19 I 1 3 3 0 0 67 67 0 0 <br />'l'eE Dry Fork 071596 16 16 0 0 9 9 0 0 4 4 0 0 <br />"'0 130 9 9 0 0 <br />"'- Baker 071696 6.7 66 0.1 I 120 10 1 <br />en <br /><: Maximum difference I I 10 -4 -4 -4 <br />'" <br />" 57 71 71 71 71 <br />n Percenl of samples wilh 57 <br />.. <br />::E 110 difference <br />" 86 86 <br />!l Percent of samples 100 <br />~ within plus or minus I <br />!i lowesl. rounding unit <br />m <br />c: <br />" Laboratory pH Laboratory specific conductance Residue on evaporation <br />" <br />m --- -- <br />~ Station Date Env. Split Dill. 1 Env. Split Ditt.' Env. Split Diff.1 <br />(') Diff.2 Dill. 2 Dill. 2 <br />0 (flSlcm) (flSlcm) (flSlcm) (mgIL) (mgIL) (mgIL) <br />0- (standard units) <br />iil Gunnison near 090596 8.0 8.0 0 0 980 978 2 2 749 738 II 1] <br />0. <br />0 Grand Junction <br />" <br />.r Gore 10~495 8.0 7.9 0.1 I 3~9 3~7 2 ~ 193 ]91 2 2 <br />~ <br />z Uncompahgre 072596 8.0 8.0 0 0 575 573 2 2 396 391 5 5 <br />a <br />0- French 090996 7.1 7.3 -0.2 -2 255 256 -I -I 164 164 0 0 <br />~ Dry 08~996 7.9 7.9 0 0 I.~OO 1.210 -10 -I 916 922 -6 -6 <br />::E Dry Fork 071596 8.1 8. I 0 0 2.290 ~.290 0 0 1,730 1.760 -)0 -) <br />.. <br />!i Baker 071696 7.6 7.8 -0.2 -~ 59 61 3 -~ 44 40 4 4 <br />b <br /><: Maximum difference -0.2 -~ -10 ,,2 -30 II <br />!!. <br />~ Percent of ~amples wilh 57 57 14 14 14 14 <br /> no difference <br /> Percent of samples 71 43 14 <br /> within plus or minus I <br /> lowest rounding unil ---- <br />