Laserfiche WebLink
<br />536 <br /> <br />TOPPfNG ET AL: COLORADO RIVER SEDIMENT TRANSPORT. I <br /> <br /> 14 <br /> 12 <br />w 10 <br />'" <br />~~- 8 <br />OZ0 6 <br />tJOB 4 <br />Z::;;.g 2 <br />;:J:a; <br />z"E 0 <br />wiljc -2 <br />~a:~ -4 <br />CW.- <br />Wt:E -6 <br />'" - <br />w< -8 <br />z -10 <br />u: <br /> -12 <br /> -14 <br /> e) <br /> 14 <br /> 12 <br />w 10 <br />'" <br /><" 8 <br />0:.... 6 <br />OZ"ii' <br />....Oll 4 <br />"'::;; <br />;!;,,~ 2 <br />~~E 0 <br />ww 6 -2 <br />~a::= -4 <br />C~- <br />w .s -6 <br />'" <br />w< -8 <br />z -10 <br />u: <br /> -12 <br /> -14 <br /> d) <br /> <br /> <br />JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN <br /> <br /> <br />JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN <br /> <br />Figure 10. (continued) <br /> <br />the approximate threshold between sand accumulation and <br />conveyance (Le., 250 m'js) only 27.0% of the time and ex- <br />ceeded the approximate threshold between sand conveyance <br />and erosion (i.e., 450 m'js) only 8.8% of the time. During the <br />season of sand erosion (April-June), flows exceeded the ap- <br />proximate threshold between sand accumulation and convey- <br />ance 90.4% of the time and exceeded the approximate thresh- <br />old between sand conveyance and erosion 69.1% of the time <br />(Figure II). <br />When compared to that in the predam era, the hydrology of <br />the postdam Colorado River during sediment years 1966-1970 <br />was closer to that during the predam season of sand erosion <br />(April-June) than it was to the hydrology during the predam <br />season of sand accumulation and storage (July-March). Fur- <br />thermore, given that the hydrology of the Colorado River <br />during sediment years 1966-1970 was similar to that during the <br />rest of the postdam era (sediment years 1966-1998), interpre- <br />tations of the magnitude and duration of sand storage based on <br />this limited period of sediment data should be valid for the <br />entire postdam era (Figure 11). Indeed, flows were slightly <br />higher during sediment years 1966-1998 than they were during <br />sediment years 1966-1970, suggesting that the data from sed- <br />iment years 1966-1970 provide an upper bound on the mag- <br />nitude and duration of seasonal sand accumulation and storage. <br />During sediment years 1966-1970, flows exceeded the approxi- <br />mate predam threshold between sand accumulation i] nd con. <br />veyance 68.1% of the time; during sediment years 196(j-1998, <br /> <br />flows exceeded the approximate predam threshold between <br />sand conveyance and erosion 73.6% of the time (Figure 11). <br /> <br />6.3. Discussion of Ihe Annual and Seasonal Sediment <br />Budgets <br /> <br />Analysis of the annual sediment budget does not invalidate <br />the hypothesis that in both the predam and postdam era the <br />Colorado River in Marble Canyon and upper Grand Canyon <br />was an annually supply-limited system with respect to fine <br />sediment (i.e., sand and finer material). During the 19 years of <br />complete sediment data the magnitudes of the annual fine- <br />sediment supply and export are equal to within the uncertain- <br />ties in the sediment budget in aU but four years. The fine- <br />sediment export can be shown to have exceeded the supply in <br />only sediment years 1949 and 1965. Sediment year 1949 was a <br />year in which a large snowmelt flood occurred (Figure 9b), and <br />sediment year 1965 was a year with abnormally high dam <br />releases (Figure 9b). The high flows in 1965 scoured the reach <br />immediately downstream of the dam [Pemberlon, 1976; Wil- <br />liams and Wolman, 1984; Burkham, 1986] and, as suggested by <br />this sediment budget, scoured sediment from much of Marble <br />and Grand Canyons. The fine-sediment supply can be shown to <br />have exceeded the export in only sediment years 1954 and 1963 <br />(Table 1). Sediment year 1954 was the predam year in the <br />period of sediment record with the lowest flows (Figure 9b). <br />and sediment year 1963 was the year in which the dam was <br />closed and in which the naturally erosive snowmelt flood was <br />