|
<br />TOPPING ET AL, COLORADO RIVER SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, 1
<br />
<br />dam river in Marble and Grand Canyons was annually supply-
<br />limited with respect to fine sediment Therefore, to test
<br />whether the predam Colorado River between the Lees Ferry
<br />and Grand Canyon gages met the integral constraint of annual
<br />supply limitation with respect to fine sediment, we constructed
<br />a sediment budget for the 141-km-long reach of the Colorado
<br />River in Marble Canyon and upper Grand Canyon.
<br />
<br />6.1, Annual Sediment Budget
<br />
<br />Fine sediment is supplied to the Colorado River in Marble
<br />Canyon and upper Grand Canyon from (1) the Colorado River
<br />in Glen Canyon (this ceased (Q be a major source after closure
<br />of the dam), (2) the Paria River (which enters the Colorado
<br />River at river mile 0.9 at the head of Marble Canyon), (3) the
<br />Little Colorado River (which enters the Colorado River at
<br />river mile 61.5 at the lower end of Marble Canyon), and (4) the
<br />smaUer ungaged tributaries between river mile 0 and 87.4-
<br />During the predam era, large quantities of fine sediment were
<br />supplied to the Colorado River in Marble Canyon and upper
<br />Grand Canyon during tributary floods that typicaUy occurred
<br />in both July-October and January-April, whereas the largest
<br />quantities of fine sediment were exported during the annual
<br />snowmelt flood. Thus neither calendar years (January-
<br />December) nor water years (October-September) were the
<br />best time period to use in computing annual sediment budgets
<br />because the season of largest sediment export fell between the
<br />two seasons of greatest tributary sediment supply. Therefore
<br />we constructed a sediment budget for years beginning on July
<br />1 of the preceding calendar year and ending on June 30 of the
<br />current calendar year, a year herein defined as a "sediment
<br />year." For example, by this definition, sediment year 1957 was
<br />the year between July 1, 1956, and June 30, 1957.
<br />Constructing a sediment budget for Marble Canyon and the
<br />upper Grand Canyon was a relatively straightforward process
<br />because of the high spatial density and long duration of sedi-
<br />ment-transport data collected by the USGS. For over 2 de-
<br />cades, daily suspended-sediment concentrations were mea-
<br />sured at two stations on the main stem in this reach and at
<br />stations on the two major tributary suppliers of sediment, that
<br />is, the Paria and Little Colorado Rivers. On the main stem
<br />Colorado River these data were collected at the Lees Ferry
<br />and Grand Canyon gages (Figure 1). At the Lees Ferry gage,
<br />suspended-sediment concentrations were measured with mod-
<br />em USGS sampling equipment from October 1, 1947, through
<br />August 13, 1965. After August 13, 1965, suspended-sediment
<br />concentrations were measured only occasionally at this site. At
<br />the Grand Canyon gage, suspended-sediment concentrations
<br />were measured with modern USGS sampling equipment from
<br />June 1, 1944, through November 28,1944, from April 25, 1945,
<br />through April 27, 1945. and from May 13, 1945, through Sep-
<br />tember 30, 1972. Suspended-sediment data collected at the
<br />Grand Canyon gage prior to June 1, 1944. from November 29.
<br />1944, through April 24, 1945, and from April 28, 1945, through
<br />May 12, 1945, were not used in this analysis because the sus-
<br />pended-sediment sampler used during these periods has been
<br />shown to oversample suspended sand by as much as a factor of
<br />2-2.5 depending on the method of sampler deployment lFed-
<br />eral/mer-Agency River Basin Committee, 1957; Topping et al.,
<br />1996]. On the Paria River, suspended-sediment concentralions
<br />were measured at the Paria River Lees Ferry gage from Oc-
<br />tober I, 1947. through Septcllll'cr 30,1976 (Figure I). On the
<br />Litlle Colorado River. susp,:"ded-sec1iment concentrations
<br />
<br />531
<br />
<br />were measured from October 1, 1947, through September 30,
<br />1970, at the highway 89 bridge at Cameron, Arizona (Figure 1).
<br />In this sediment budget the monthly fine-sediment supply
<br />was set equal to the combined measured monthly loads of the
<br />Colorado River at Lees Ferry, the Paria River, the Little Col-
<br />orado River, and an estimation of the monthly loads of the
<br />ungaged tributaries (described in Appendix A). The monthly
<br />fine-sediment export was set equal to the measured monthly
<br />load of the Colorado River atlhe Grand Canyon gage. During
<br />periods of missing record, most notably between the measure-
<br />ments made after August 1965 at the Colorado River Lees
<br />Ferry gage, daily sediment loads were estimated by interpola-
<br />lion. Longer periods of missing record at the Grand Canyon
<br />gage prevented sediment budgets from being constructed from
<br />June 2, 1956, through August 31, 1956, and from August I,
<br />1958, through March 31,1959.
<br />Prior to constructing and interpreting any sediment budget,
<br />it is essential that the sources and magnitudes of measurement
<br />error be understood and quantified so that appropriate uncer-
<br />tainties can be assigned. As justified in Appendix B, the fol-
<br />lowing uncertainties were assigned to the measured monthly
<br />and annual sediment loads, (1) 5% for the Colorado River at
<br />the Lees Ferry and Grand Canyon gages and (2) 20% for the
<br />Paria and Little Colorado Rivers. As justified in Appendix A,
<br />an uncertainty of a factor of 3 was assigned to the estimated
<br />monthly and annual sedirnentloads of the ungaged iributaries.
<br />These uncertainties in the measured and estimated loads are
<br />not unreasonably high and, if anything, may be too low.
<br />The annual supplies of fine sediment (from each of the four
<br />sources) to the reach between the Lees Ferry and Grand Can-
<br />yon gages and the annual export of fine sediment from this
<br />reach are shown in Figure 9a. Prior to closure of the dam, the
<br />major supplier of fine sedirnentto this reach was tbe Colorado
<br />River above the Lees Ferry gage (i.e., the Colorado River in
<br />Glen Canyon). During the predam year> with complete sedi-
<br />ment-transport data at the Lees Ferry gage (sediment years
<br />1949-1962), the mean annual supply of sediment from the
<br />Colorado River in Glen Canyon was 57 :!: 3 million t (t indi-
<br />cates metric ton) (of which approximately 40% was sand).
<br />During the predam year> with complete sediment-transport
<br />data at the Grand Canyon gage (i.e., sediment years 1948-
<br />1955, 1958, and 1960-1962), the mean-annual export of fine
<br />sediment from this reach was 83 :::!:: 4 million t (of which ap-
<br />proximately 35% was sand). Because the first few yeaTS after
<br />closure of Glen Canyon Dam in March 1%3 were not repre-
<br />sentative of the fluctuating flows that typify most of the post-
<br />dam era [U.S. Departmenl of the In/erior, 1995], these years
<br />were not used to determine mean-annual postdam loads of the
<br />Colorado River. Dam releases during these years consisted of
<br />quasi-steady low flows through much of 1963 and 1964 and
<br />sustained high flows during April-June 1965 (Figure 9b). In
<br />the initial period of daily fluctuating flows following the high
<br />dam releases of 1965 (i.e., sediment yeaTS 1966-1970), the
<br />mean-annual supply of sediment from the Colorado River in
<br />Glen Canyon was only 0.24 :!: 0.01 million 1. This represented
<br />a decrease of 99.5-99.6% in the mean-annual predam supply
<br />of fine sediment from this source. Following the high flows in
<br />1965 (i.e., sediment yeaTS 1966-1972), the mean-annual export
<br />of fine sediment past the Grand Canyon gage was 14 :!: 1
<br />million 1. This represented a decrease of 81-85% in the mean-
<br />annual predam export of fine sediment.
<br />The other major predam suppliers of fine sediment, and the
<br />only major suppliers of sediment to the reach between the Lees
<br />
|