Laserfiche WebLink
<br />L~l,I;;"i3 <br /> <br />to navigation. Gavins Point is oper~ted to level out <br />the Power fluctuations for the 732 mile navigation <br />channel from Sioux City to St. Louis. Equal and com- <br />mensurate emphasis is given the power function dur- <br />ing the winter period as was given navigation in the <br />summer. <br /> <br />Water supply-here again, no significant impact. <br /> <br />IRRIGATION <br /> <br />We do have over 400 permits for irrigation with- <br />drawals in the reservoir areas, but they are mostly <br />small. The large federal irrigation projects that were <br />originally envisioned in the Pick-Sloan Plan were <br />never constructed or completed so our impacts for op- <br />erating for irrigation are very minor. We see no pri- <br />mary impacts on any of the functions from irrigation. <br /> <br />NAVIGATION <br /> <br />Going on to navigation, we do target flows for the <br />four stations downstream from Cavins Point to main- <br />tain navigation flows. I showed a loading operation at <br />Ag Processors in Sioux City and the Sioux City/New <br />Orleans terminal here in Omaha, Nebraska. I did at- <br />tend a navigation conference in Council Bluffs last <br />year that indicated there are some spinoff henefIts, <br />even though uur tonnage is low, from the navigation <br />function providing competitive rates for all types of <br />transportation because barge tramc is available. An- <br />other spinoff benefit is that the stabilized channel for <br />navigation also protects the riverbanks and after a <br />flood like we experienced in 1984, the river channel is <br />back where it belongs after the flood, which is quite <br />different on some rivers like the Platte River and the <br />Elkhorn River which continue taking farmland. <br /> <br />Looking at the impa.cts on navigation, there is some <br />conflict with flood control, but this is minimized by <br />reducing to minimum flow levels for navigation during <br />downstream floods and advising the Coast Guard <br />when to curtail traffic due to wave and wake action <br />on downstream levees. In June of 1984 navigation was <br />curtailed for a 30-day period because of the high water. <br /> <br />Hydropower is in competition with navigation re- <br />leases, but normally we are able to accommodate the <br />hydropower requirement. If we didn't have navigation <br />we would probably be better able to adjust to the hy- <br />dropower demands. Irrigation during severe <br />droughts-the benefit to the river reaches downstream <br />of the reservoirs would result from the release of water <br />for navigation. <br /> <br />Recreation-there is a benefit during droughts be- <br />cause we would be releasing water for downstream <br />river reaches. That would go the same for fish and <br />wildlife on spawning operations downstream. <br /> <br />Water supply-operations for navigation is also <br />compatible with water supply requirements down- <br />stream of the reservoirs. <br /> <br />RECREATION <br /> <br />Recreation-whether it's swimming at one of t.he <br />reservoirs, fishing downstream of Gavins Point, boat- <br />ing on the reservoirs, or camping, recreation is a big <br />business on the lower river and it does add to tourism <br />at both the reservoir sites and on the downstream <br />river. The impacts from recreation, we also at times <br />have to try to maintain constant levels on the lower <br />river for duck blinds that are set up where they set <br />their decoys out. We try to accommodate that, but it <br />is not our major purpose. <br /> <br />Looking at the impacts of recreation on flood con- <br />trol, there are no impacts because releases are cut back <br />when floods do occur. Hydropower generation-re- <br />lease fluctuations for peaking may conflict with fishing <br />and boating below the reservoirs. Endangered spe- <br />cies-although not significant on the reservoirs, rec- <br />reational use of the river sandbars downstream can be <br />detrimental to the tern and plover. Last year they <br />found that some of the people who were using some <br />of the sandbars had done some damage to the tern <br />nests with fIreworks. So recreation can be detrimental <br />on the sandbar areas. <br /> <br />Fish and wildlife is no signifIcant impact. Water <br />supply and irrigation and recreation has no significant <br />impact. <br /> <br />WATER SUPPLY AND WATER QUALITY <br /> <br />Water intakes, like Duane showed at MUD and this, <br />although very hard to see, is one of the power plants <br />in Sioux City. They did come close to having a problem <br />at MUD. They also came close at the Neil North Plant <br />to having an intake problem when we had that ice jam <br />below Gavins Point this year. <br /> <br />Impacts at the current level of water supply is not <br />great. If we look at flood control we do maintain min- <br />imum releases from most our reservoirs that facilitate <br />water supply and water quality, such as the 6,000 cfs <br />minimum from Gavins Point. There is no significant <br />impact to hydropower, irrigation or fIsh and wildlife <br /> <br />35 <br />