Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1\' <br />-..J <br />1-- <br />--J <br /> <br />irrigation season encom passes <br />about 59 percent of the year. thc <br />nonirrigation season about 41 per- <br />cent of the year). The reason for <br />using a seasonally weighted mean <br />is because of the large differences <br />in streamfiow and dissolved-solids <br />loads between the irrigation and <br />nonirrigation seasons in many <br />Grand Valley streams and washes. <br />[fthe periodic sampling was biased <br />to one of the seasons (for example. <br />if most of the samples were col. <br />lected in the irrigation season). <br />then an arithmetic mean on all the <br />samples might result in an unrealis- <br />tic mean dissolved-solids load. if <br />that mean is assumed to represent <br />the dai Iy load throughout the year. <br />Using a seasonally weighted mean <br />removes seasonal sampling bias. <br />Once the seasonally weighted <br />mean is calculated. the resultant <br />mean load is assumcd tl) represent <br />the mean annual dissolved.solids <br />load and is multiplied by 365.25 <br />to estimate the total annual dis. <br />solved-solids load for a multi-year <br />period in which the sampling was <br />done. <br />To determine if annual dis. <br />solved.solids loads cotnputed <br />using only periodic data are repre- <br />sentative of actual loads. the loads <br />for 1973-83 also were computed <br />using another melhl>u called <br />SLOAD. A computer program <br />named SLOAD (Salt LOAD) was <br />developed by LiellCnnann and <br />others (1987) for estimating dis- <br />solved-solids loads in streams and <br />rivers. In the SLOAD method. <br />daily weamfiow. daily specifie- <br />conductance. and periodic <br />dissolved-solids data are used to <br />estimate loads. Two equations are <br />computed usmg the periodic data. <br />One equation rdates dissolved. <br /> <br />solids load to streamflow. and the <br />second equation relates dissolved. <br />solids load to streamflow and <br />specific conductance. The equa- <br />tions then arc used to compute <br />daily loads for the time period of <br />interest using the daily streamfiow <br />record and. if available, daily spe- <br />cific conductance. The daily loads <br />arc summcd to give monthly and <br />annual dissolved-solids loads. <br />Dissolved-solids loads computed <br />using the SLOAD method should <br />be a more accurate estimate of <br />dissol ved.solids loads when com. <br />pared to the periodic method <br />because much ml>rc detailed data <br />(daily streamflow and specific <br />conductance) are used instead of <br />only periodic dissolved-solids data. <br />A comrarison of the two methods <br />is provided in the next section of <br />this fact sheet. <br /> <br />Comparison of Methods <br /> <br />Annual dissolved-solids <br />loads calculated by the two meth. <br />ods are compared in table 2. The <br />loads are applicable to the periods <br />when (he g;tging swtions were <br />ore rated at the lour sites during <br />1973-83 (table I). The ditTerences <br /> <br />in annual loads rangcd from ;lI1out <br />4 to 8 percent (table 2). Using the <br />reriodic method, the annual dis. <br />solved-solids loads for Leach <br />Creek and Big Salt Wash were less <br />than the annual loads eompuled <br />using the SLOAD method: the <br />orposite was true for Reed Wash <br />and Salt Creek (table 2). For the <br />four stations. the annual loads <br />based only on periodic data are not <br />substantially different than the <br />annual loads computed using <br />SLOAD. The implication is th;lt <br />the periodic dissolved.solids.load <br />data were collected over the oen. <br />'" <br />eral range of streamllow and dis. <br />solved-solids concentrations lor <br />several years at these four sites and <br />that fairly reliable estimates or <br />annual dissolved-solids loads can <br />be obtained without having daily <br />slrcamnow data. A disadvanrage of <br />using only periodic samrles is that <br />runolf from large storms may be <br />missed. In the Grand Valley. such <br />storms arc relatively mfrequent and <br />orten of shan duratIon. At least for <br />the reriods when the four gaging <br />stations were operated, resulls indi- <br />cated that using only periodic data <br />for computing dissolved.solids <br />loads provides reasonable cst,. <br />males of the annual loads. <br /> <br />Table 2 Comparison 01 annual dissolved-solids loads computed uSing two methods <br /> <br />11'<.:rll"'-.tI": rTl~'lh(>;j. 'lnl~ l~nodic wal~r-quJ.lily ;mJ ,lr.:-allllh"... J,lla ;H~ u~J 10 C'[11I1:II,' I(lad,_ SL(lt\1) <br />IIIClh(x!. daily ...lre.ullllnv.-' and ;,rcc1fic conductancl" ;UL' 1I".J 1\'C\WlI;llt: luad...: I""d, tllf L';Jch Crcd..: .1l1J Rig <br />SaIl W~~l:\ :w: h;\....:d on data colleclI:d durin.~ Igl.1._ll. ;mJ 1\\;0,0... h'.l" Re:cll W~hh Jnd SaIl Crc-L'K :.lIe h,hl'J lm <br />J<lla clllk":leJ Junng 19H-8.\.loads are: in ton:- per year I <br /> <br /> Annual dissolved- Difference in loads, <br />Stream solids load periodic minus SLOAD <br /> Periodic SLOAD Load Percent <br />Leach Crt.'d, 41.400 44.9011 -J.500 -7 X <br />Big Sail \\':J~h XJ.~OO 8!t~OO ,5.(XJ() -).7 <br />Reel! \\'a~h 1.11.).('100 1.\0.000 9.61Xl 7" <br />Sal! Cn:d IJ I.JOO I :!5,)OO 5.HOIJ -U, <br />