Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001530 <br /> <br />cropping patterns for each climatic zone, and derived an estimated <br />repayment capacity based upon that cropping pattern that maximized <br />on-farm returns. No distinctions were made between various land <br />classes in developing the Level A repayment capacities. Instead, the <br />favorable assumption was made that all parcels were capable of <br />producing crops and yields associated with Class 1 soils. <br />In some cases, however, individual parcels are unsuitable for the <br />cropping patterns associated with Class 1 soils, Thus, the first step <br />in the Level B economic analysis was to substitute an appropriate <br />cropping pattern, if necessary, based upon the land classification of <br />the parcel under consideration. The crop suitability assessments were <br />based upon the results of the agronomic study conducted by Boyle <br />Engineering. Once an appropriate cropping pattern was substituted, <br />on-farm returns were recalculated using the new cropping pattern, and <br />appropriate adjustments were made to the repayment capacity estimate <br />for the parcel. <br />3.0 Land Clearing and Preparation <br />The Level A economic analysis included the costs of seedbed <br />tillage operations necessary to establish irrigated crops on untilled <br />soil. The Level A analysis did not, however, include the costs of <br />canopy and brush removal prior to seedbed preparation. These costs <br />were omitted from the Level A analysis because they can vary from <br />parcel to parcel depending upon the extent of canopy cover. To <br />estimate canopy and brush removal costs, parcels were classified into <br />one of three categories based upon the land classification analysis <br />performed by Stoneman-Landers, Inc. These categories are: <br /> <br />2 <br />