Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001537 <br /> <br />resulted in a negative residual repayment capacity for Parcel A36. It <br />should not be considered further as potential PIA. <br />Parcels A41, A46 and A49 were all judged suitable for the <br />alfalfa, malt barley cropping rotation that maximizes repayment <br />capacity. All are located within five miles of a central equipment <br />warehouse location, and have less than 10 percent tree canopy. Thus, <br />the only repayment capacity adjustments for these parcels was a <br />minimum three dollar annualized land clearing adjustment. After this <br />adjustment, all three of these parcels retained positive repayment <br />capacities, and remain as potential PIA. <br />After eliminating Parcel A36 from consideration, the total of <br />currently irrigated and potentially irrigated acreage in the Animas <br />Watershed is approximately 578 acres. This figure is slightly below <br />the assumed cutoff of 600 acres needed to achieve the economy of scale <br />assumptions employed in the Level A economic analysis. Since the <br />figure is so close to the cutoff, however, no further adjustments were <br />made. <br />The economies of scale assumed in the Level A economic analysis <br />should be achievable in the Florida Watershed, since there are <br />approximately 7QO acres of currently irrigated land in proximity of <br />Parcel F10. This parcel is less than five miles from a theoretical <br />central warehouse location, and contains less than 10 percent tree <br />canopy. The three dollar clearing cost adjustment reduced the four <br />dollar preliminary repayment capacity to one dollar. Nevertheless, <br />this parcel still retains positive repayment capacity and should be <br />considered potential PIA. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />,$i <br />