My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05598
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05598
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:08:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/1/1946
Author
Metro Water District
Title
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California - Eighth Annual Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~:31 <br /> <br />00 <br /> <br />'I ~ T 11 0 POL IT ,\ N W ,\ T E R ]) 1ST HIe T <br /> <br />A somewhat similal" though so far as can be verified from the <br />available data, shorter and less severe drought period was recorded <br />in 1897-1904 on the Colorado River. The curve of Fig, 6 is there. <br />fore computed and plotted on the basis of the mean annual runoff <br />records (and estimates) for the period 1905-1946, due solely to <br />statistical con8ideration~J to avoid. the inclusion of two severe <br />drought periods and one abnormally wet period in the approxi- <br />mation to the long-time mean, Also merely on a statistical basis, <br />it is probable that such major dry periods as noted will recur with <br />a frequency of about twice in a century, or slightly oftener, and <br />with flows nol exceeding the Compact "guarantcc" for a decade <br />or longer. There is much valid evidence that longer and more <br />severe droughts have occurred in the past, prior to stream gaging, <br />than during the relatively sho,'t historical period of record. It <br />must therefore be assumed that such dry periods will recur in the <br />future. E\'en on the basis of the historical record, however, the <br />Compact minimum flow will not. ue dependably and permanently <br />available without. the ultimate construction of additional large up. <br />st.ream reservoirs, which in t.he aggregate must equal or even <br />exceed Boulder Canyon re~~rvoir in capacity. <br /> <br />Columdo Rive)' ,,,nter q/lalit)! <br /> <br />The outflow from Boulder Vam during the water year t.o Sep- <br />tember 30, 1946 was slightly improved in qualit.y, being lower in <br />dissolved solids and total hardness as compared with the previous <br />year, according to available preliminary dat.a. At. the aqueduct <br />intake near Parker Dam. monthly samples show a total hardness <br />averaging 326 parts per million for ]946 compared with 343 parls <br />per million for 1945 and a record maximum of 420 parts per mil. <br />lion in April 1941. Similarly, natural Colorado River water at t.he <br />District softening and filtration plant at La Verne showed a re- <br />duction in total hardness of 10 parts per million from 363 for <br />1944.45 to 353 for the current year H145-46. The specific con- <br />ductivity "K", which is an approximate index of total dissolved <br />selids, avemged 102,5 in 1946 at the aqueduct intake, compared <br />with 104,5 for 194;; and 1944, Tot.al dissolved solids averaged <br />about 650 parts per million at the aqueduct intake in 1946 for a <br />decre,,,e of 190 parts per million, compared with April 1941. <br />In Lake Mead, just above Boulder Dam, a dozen wat.er samples <br />at 50-foot depth intervals give the foil owing average anaiyses for <br />August 1946 and for one year previously. These averages are <br />weighted in proportion to the storagc volume represented by each <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.