Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1060 <br /> <br />COMMENTARY <br /> <br />It should be emphasized that much of the value of this study, includ- <br />ing the proposed plan for augmentation, is dependent upon the accuracy of gross <br />consumptive use estimates made by the Lowry-Johnson method, and there is evidence <br />to indicate that this method underestimates consumptive use. Investigation to <br />determine the most accurate method will be high on the priority list of future <br />studies, and recalculation of affected items will be done if required. <br /> <br />The proposed plan for augmentation must be regarded as preliminary for <br />another reason. It has been assumed that the water judge will limit the water <br />supply to the amount that can be put to beneficial use. The opinion of the staff <br />of the Water Conservation Board is that it is the intent of Senate Bill No. 81 <br />to impose such a limit; thus, maximizing the beneficial use of the state's total <br />water resources. If the water judge interprets the law differently the plan will <br />have to be revised. <br /> <br />Mr. C. T. Jenkins of the U.S.G.S. District Office has reviewed the <br />proposed plan for augmentation and has pointed out a possible flaw in the plan - <br />"residual stream depletion at beginning of next season due to pumping 58 cfs <br />for 60 days would be almost 2 cfs. Remedy - construct recharge trench and re- <br />charge during the winter the amount pumped during the Summer. Trench should be <br />as far from the river as possible." This will be investigated, possibly, by con- <br />struction of a digital model of the Oxford Farmers system and testing the proposed <br />plan for augmentation under historic conditions beginning with irrigation season <br />1949. This should reveal any problems that might develop from use of the plan. <br /> <br />The study will extend through irrigation seasons 1971 and 1972. The <br />additional data should allow a general improvement in the analyses. Water bud- <br />get computations and ground water quality aspects are good examples. We plan <br />to make measurements which could lead to better estimates of irrigation effi- <br />ciency (i.e., canal, lateral and farm losses). An aquifer test planned for the <br />~pring of 1971 would result in a better estimate of specific yield and a better <br />understanding of the aquifer. In addition, there is the possibility of a dry <br />year, and a dry year is really when this type of study would have the most <br />benefi ts. <br /> <br />We wish to thank the irrigators of the Oxford Farmers system, the <br />U. S. Geological Survey and the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation for their coopera- <br />tion in this study. <br /> <br />- 26 - <br />