Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1058 <br /> <br />that amounted to 700 cfs. With diversions between the two gages of approx- <br />imately 200 cfs, this indicates that, at times, 500 cfs or more is lost in the <br />l7.1 mile reach, which is highly unlikely. It is doubtful that anything can <br />be done to correct the inaccuracies in the records, but the possibility will be <br />investigated. One approach will be to correlate seepage calculated from a water <br />budget using the change in ground water storage determined from the cross sections <br />with the flow past the Nepesta gaging station or the Catlin Dam gaging station <br />or the difference between the two. <br /> <br />If it is determined that a reliable estimate of the change in ground <br />storage can be determined through a water budget of this type it would be of <br />some advantage. It could be easily calculated from historic records and would <br />allow consideration through the drier years. In addition, the water budget could <br />extend through the non-irrigation season. <br /> <br />- 18 - <br />