WSP05579 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

105l are not available, these areas are in many respects similar to the nationally-lmovm vacation-lands of the Gunnison Country. UplpJ1d ~2ll1e a..,d fur animals are in many We;IS less .?.ffected th2:1 fishes by chan~es in the amounts of r;ater "v"ilable, ]181'ticularly if strsam flow or lake elevations do not fluctuate greatly after " neT! set of condi- tions has been put into effect. But all !U1imals are de]Iendent upon their natural rood supplies. If deer or elk, for example, are prcvcenteLl from reaching summer or winter ranGe by canals \,hich they ca.~.,ot cross, or if their winter or summer range is roduced in area by inundation resulting from construction of a reservoir, the effect is a re&lction in the total numbers of game species \',hich can be supported on the ran.[ies of the Stat8. A similar situation prevails in the production of domestic sheep or cattle when a reservoir inundates hay meadO\~s formerly used te produce riintcr feed sufficient to carr,{ over the animals that in other months \"ould ra..,ce on National Forests or other public lands. Loss of lands "hich provide winter food automatically limits the number of animals rlhich would use adjacent summer range lands. The foregoing paragraphs are intended to provide a background against which the various features of the Gunnison-Arka"lsas Project nay be viewed objectively. A sound comprehensive plan of development imylies full consideration of all interests and needs. In a plan which "o~ld seek the fullest use of some of the resources involved and the preserva- tion of others, some compromise is inevitable. . TIe shall not attempt in the follo,dng discussion of the project features to go into details. ~e wish rather to Doint o~t in seneral ter~s how those features, as planned, would affect fish and .;;ildlife, and hO\~ they might be modified to protect e"~stinG values, The features ]'Ihich rle ,';ill consider here are as follows: (1) Diversions from the Fryin::o Pnn niv8r ;!nO its tribut"ries, (2) Div2rsions from the ~oarinG Fork River ,,~i its tribut?Ti"", (3) Construction of Aspen Reservoir on Roerinc; rork River, (4) Modification of e:dstin[; r8s'2rvoirs, incl'~"-ing Clear Creek, Twin Likes, ~~d Turquoise Lak~, 2nd co~st~lction of Pu~81o Reservoir on the Arkansas River, and (S) Diversions of natural stream flow from the Arkansas Ri,er ))etTl8en Leadville and Salida by the Arka.,s2s For;er Cc.nal. In the prouosed diversion of ~)proximately 60,000 acre-feet of water annually from the F~[inc Pan River and its tribut2~ies, one large 3