Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-, <br /> <br />1042 <br /> <br />10. Any industrial uses of the Colorado River, such as those.described <br />in Paragraph 6( e), would have a right junior to that of the Independence Pass <br />Diversion. However, winter diversions by the Independence Pass Tunnel would <br />have the effect of decreasing the flow of the Colorado River and in critical <br />years such decreases ~0\~d place an additional burden on other storaGe sites <br />which may be utilized to help supply the industrial demands on the Colorado <br />Ri ver. Comparison of the ultimate streamflows at CB.!!leo following the develop- <br />ments described in P~ragraph 6 with the anticipated ultimate diversions by <br />the Independence Pass Tunnel, indicates that about 1,700 acre-feet of addi- <br />tionHI storage capacity in the Aspen Reservoir would be needed if storage <br />in that site were used to meet future industrial demands to the extent that <br />winter diversions by the Independence Pass Tunnel would deplete the ultimate <br />flow at Cameo. <br /> <br />Possible Winter Diversions from Fr,.'ing Pan Creek <br /> <br />11. All of the nrecedinc discussions are based on the assumption that <br />there would be no winter wnter exported by the Frying Pun Diversion. The <br />water studies shov, that on the average there is about 8,hoO acre-feet of <br />water \'rl,ich \'ypasses the collection system of the Frying Pan diversion in <br />the mont.~~s of l:lctober tc J.:nrch., inclusive. This viater WA.S Hssumed to he <br />needec:. :~' ::W.i..lltC.i:l Ii ve s:'~'eams for fish preservuticn :.:elc~'l tile ccllecticn <br />s~/ste!:-... .:.. It~rL:e p~;.rt cf 7j-:e collection sY5te!~ is tUJ~I~el, w!lich ,":auld :e <br />physice.lly cll;:e.ble of c:ivertinc; an act(\itional 5,000 ,,"cre-feet in criticc.l <br />wi!Jter periods if operc.tion experience show:::: t.he (iesirelil'ility trlereofo <br />In such critical ;:ea!'s, it would ue r;ecessury to pro-lice replacemen t ~torage <br />to avoid interference with the winter demands at Carneo described in Para- <br />"raph 6. <br /> <br />12. Difficult Creek is a tributary of the RoarinG Fork above A"pen. <br />Studies are currently being made of the possibility of divertinG an averaGe <br />of about 10,000 acre-feet annually of the flow of this stream to the Arkansas <br />vratershecl in connection wi toh possible future staGes of t'1e Gunnison-Arko.nsas <br />Project. In the critical period of 1934-"35, it would be necessar,r to Olrovide <br />2,400 acre-feet of replacement storage to avoid interference v,ith nr"cent <br />and future uses in Western Colorado. <br /> <br />Swnmar;.- of storap:e requirements <br /> <br />13. The studies are based on daily streamfJ.oN records at Asnen 8J"'C <br />at Cl:lf."!eo in the cr-itice.l !-,eriod. T!le results of the study A.re rrpsented <br />in the following table. The storuce requirements represent active cr,llficity <br />and are in addition to nn)T 3ffiall amount of dead stornse ';rhich may bB :,ro_ <br />vided. <br /> <br />5 <br />