My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05579
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:21:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:07:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8147
Description
Gunnison-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Water Division
4
Date
11/24/1948
Author
Pol Rev Com Gun-Ark
Title
Minutes of Meeting Policy and Review Committee Gunnison-Arkansas Project Colorado with attached reports and documentation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />lOG"ZmanimOUs endorsement of the proposal. :;r. Chri~ty stated thc.t thii'action <br />by the irrigators illu~trates the intent of the major irrigation intorest <br />in the valley to mike efficient regulation and utilization of existing <br />vroter resources in ,the ,\rkansas River,Ba$in" l~. Christy expressed oOnfi- <br />dence that the proposed salvage .'Jill not be detrimental to the inflow to <br />John Martin Reservoir. In r,esponse to l.U'. Beise's question, Hr. Powell <br />estimated that about 220,000 aore-feet of ,vater annually oould be made, <br />available for irrigation diversion as a result of effeoting the prooesses <br />adopted in the above-quoted iteLls, and 'l'lith allowances for inported projeot <br />water, increased Twin Lakes imports and revise of return flow from imported <br />and salvaged \'ro.ter. Mr. Page pointed out that such salvage of Arl:ansas <br />water is a step in the rig;ht direction as it i~ essential that the people <br />in the Valley deI;1Onstrate to the COllGress that they will I:Jake maximum use <br />of their ovm vroter resouroes before asldng for imported waters fron the <br />Colorado River. Answering !.fr. 1!erriell' s question regarding how long it <br />would take to build up the power pool, Ur- 1'0\'.'011 s'\;ated that in periods <br />beginning; with a year such as 1911 it would take about four years but that <br />the reservoirs could fill in a single year with runoff as oocurred in 1921 <br />and 1942. <br /> <br />Municipal and Domstic Uses of Water <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />5. l~. Christy stated th~t thore vms not nuch ~~re to report since <br />the Grand Junotion neetinG on nunicipal vroter requirenents for the Valley <br />towns down to Las Aninas and that the estimate of B,OOO ~cre-feet previo~sly <br />suggested still stands. He feels that the Ci-t~' of Pueblo will request tho.t <br />-the estimate of 5,000 acre-foet (inoluding the 7furtz Ditch) for ninimun <br />probable demand from the First !'hece of the GuIl!1ison-.^..rko.nsas Project, suG- <br />gested at the Grand J\L~ctic~ weeting of the Connittee, be raised to an <br />unconfirmed fiGure of 7,000 a.cre-feot. Lx. Boise asked .nlether the present <br />plan is to include -the Valle:r Pipeline in the First Phase of the potential <br />project. Llr. POl.tell c.nS:'.'ered in the affir!!lD.tive but ndvised that inolusion <br />of a water treatment plant ...ms questionable. ix. !.lerriell suggested that <br />consideration be given to supplyinS rural donestic and livestoc~ needs in <br />the valley directly fro!:! the pipeline o.s in the case of the potential Collbren <br />Project in Western Colorado thnt is planned to supply the Cit;i of Gro.nd <br />Junction v~th municipal vmter, JudGe Stone said thnt the State ~ater Conser- <br />vation Board has reconnended th~t the contenplated pipeline to Grand Junction <br />be inoluded as a pc.r1: of the potential Collbran Project. l!r. Beise asl:ed <br />about treatment of "nmicipal vroter supplies and !1r. Larson infonn..ed hin of <br />actions taken by the l"etropolitall Water District of Salt Lake City to not <br />press the Government for ~onstru~tion of filter plants and to build its Ol'm <br />distribution system from the Salt Lake Aqueduct of the Provo River Project. <br />JUdGe Stona added tho.t it io the r;cnero.l policy of tho Ilurenu that such pipe- <br />lines to nunicipalities c~~ be included as a pert of n recl~tion project <br />but that filter or water treatment nlants are a part of the municipalities' <br />problem. !!r. Hoper repor+'ed that h~ had !mde sone SUGGestions to tho <br />Bureau re~~rdi~g ~e~~~re=c~~8 for 1T.:tO~ by the City of Colorado Grriugs for <br />inclusion in th~ p:,:-ojc-'.~+ :'(l'~"'C)rt but tho.-\:; he had nothi:l~ further to report <br />to tho Comtt"e. <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />;:; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.