Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.# <br /> <br />1,1 {'\ / <br /> <br />. t,~~i <br /> <br />. C.J <br />C t2 )Ir <br />., '\ <br />(3 ( i. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />W <br />0'.) <br /> <br />Salinity Contiol Program on BL~ Lands In Colorado <br /> <br />An inventory of point sources of salinity was begun for waters on <br />public lands in Colorado in 1974. Most of the effort was concentrated <br />in the Craig District wi'th some work in the Grand Junction District. TO <br />date four flowing wells have been plugged and retention dams have been <br />constructed at two springs to act as evaporation ponds. Reductions in <br />total salt load ranges from about 11 tons per year for the smallest <br />source to about 5800 tons per year for the largest. A total reduction <br />of about 5900 tons per year has been realized at a cost of about <br />$36,000.00. A stream (Salt Creek) with extrem.ely high salt concentra- <br />tions hao; also been identified, but the flow is small and variable. <br />- Therefore, a gaging station has been installed to determine the total <br />salt contribution and the feasibility of control measures. <br /> <br />The inventory has continued on a limited basis through FY 1980 and <br />five more springs have been identified which could potentially be con- <br />trolled. Salt loads range from 14 to 30 tons per year per source and <br />construction estimates average $8,000.00 each. <br /> <br />Beginning in FY 1981, we plan to expand our inventory of water <br />sources and water uses in connection with the water rights program. As <br />highly saline sources are discovered, control measures will be explored. <br /> <br />Public Lands are estimated to contribute about 8% of the salinity <br />in the Colorado River Basin. It has also been estimated that there is <br />a potential' to control possibly as much as 20% of the 8% contribution or <br />up to 15 mg/l at Imperial Dam. In Colorado, we manage approxi:nately <br />one-third of the Public I.ands in the Upper Colorado River Basin and, at <br />most, anyone Resource Area manages about one-sixth of that. So a <br />maximum of ,0.09% of the salinity in the Upper Colorado River is being <br />addressed in our grazing ESs at anyone time. This is insignificant <br />especially ~~len compared with forage prOduction, wildlife management, <br />rangeland ma11agement and all of the other resow:ce considerations that <br />the manager must address when making multiple use decisions. As a <br />result salinity has not been considered a significant problem. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1li;.. <br /> <br />,.- <br /> <br />~ .; <br />-. ~=c:j <br /> <br />,1 <br />, <br />.~ <br /> <br />"J <br />j <br />J <br /> <br />, <br />.:, <br />, <br />I <br />:1 <br />1 <br /> <br />