Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />project cost to derive the remaining joint cost. The remaining joint cost <br />i8 then allocated among the project purposes in proportion to the residuals <br />derived by subtracting the separable cost of each purpose from the justi- <br />fiable expentiture for each purpose. A 2-1/2% interest rate was used for <br />figuring interest during construction and weighting costs and benefits <br />according to time of occurrence. A time period of 100 years was used which <br />11 <br />is the estimated economic life of the facilities. - <br /> <br />The construction of specific recreation and fish and wildlife facilities <br /> <br /> <br />by the Department of the Interior in connection with the storage units is <br /> <br /> <br />funded using money provided to the Department under Section 8 of the <br /> <br /> <br />authorizing act. The act makes the cost of these facilities, including the <br /> <br /> <br />cost of their operation and maintenance, assignable directly to the recre- <br /> <br /> <br />ation and fish and wildlife pur~oses and non-reimbursable. Accordingly, <br /> <br /> <br />the costs are not allocated along with the cost of the reservoirs, power- <br /> <br /> <br />plants and other basic facilities, and, except by specific reference, are <br /> <br /> <br />not included in the discussion of costs in this report. They are shown <br /> <br /> <br />in Table 2. <br /> <br />Since 1967 when the storage project facilities -- except some specific <br /> <br /> <br />power, recreation and fish and wildlife facilities -- were essentially <br /> <br /> <br />constructed, no separable cost-remaining benefits cost allocation has been <br /> <br /> <br />made. In lieu of this, for preliminary cost allocation purposes, each <br /> <br /> <br />unit's costs have been distributed among purposes according to the <br /> <br /> <br />generally consistent pattern which resulted from the several preliminary <br /> <br /> <br />separable-costs remaining benefits allocations which were made in 1967 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />and years just prior thereto. - <br /> <br />11 Three Bureau of Reclamation published studies show preliminary allocations <br />~f the estimated costs of the storage project using the separable costs- <br />remaining benefits method of allocation. They are: "Financial and Economic <br />Analysis, Colorado River Storage Project and Participating Projects," dated <br />February 1958 and December 1958 and "Colorado River Storage Project, <br />Appendix of Attachments for Analysis of Proposal by Private Utilities to <br />Wheel Power to Preference Customers" dated October 1960. The February 1958 <br />study was reprinted as Senate Document 101 by the 2d Session of the 85th <br />Congress. <br /> <br />~I An allocation made in 1966 is included in this report as Attachment 2 <br /> <br />7 <br />