My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05551
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05551
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:06:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
822.600.10
Description
Colorado River Annual Operating Plan - Annual Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/2002
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Annual Operating Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2001 OPERATIONS SUMMARY AND RESERVOIR STATUS <br /> <br />Water year 200 I was the second consecutive year with dry hydrologic conditions in the Colorado <br />River basin. The distribution of precipitation and sno'W-pack throughout the basin varied, <br />however. Snowpack and runoff conditions in the northern portions of the basin were much below <br />average, while near average conditions existed in the south. April through July runoff into <br />Flaming Gorge Reservoir, for instance, was only 36 percent of average, while runofffor the same <br />period was 107 percent of average for Navajo Reservoir. <br /> <br />While water year 2001 ended up being drier than normal in the Colorado River basin, hydrologic <br />conditions appeared favorable as water year 200 I began. Upper Colorado basinwide snowpack <br />on January 1, 200 I was 92 percent of average. Early season inflow projections for Colorado <br />River reservoirs were also near average. Drier than normal conditions, with below average <br />precipitation, were observed in the late winter and spring, however. During the April through <br />July runoffperiod, periodsofwarm windy weather compounded the situation, contributing to loss <br />of snowpack and reducing runoff efficiency. Unregulated April through July inflow to Lake <br />Powell in 2001 ended up being only4.30 MAF (5,304 MCM) or 56 percent of average. This was <br />nearly identical to the 4.3 5 MAF (5,370 MCM) of April through July unregulated inflow obser,-'ed <br />in water year 2000. <br /> <br />Water year 2001 unregulated inflow into Lake Powell was 6.96 MAF (8,580 MCM), or 59 <br />percent of average. This below average inflow resulted in a decrease of approximately 1.80 MAF <br />(2,230 MCM) of storage in Lake Powell. Storage in reservoirs upstream of Lake Powell <br />decreased by approximately 0.02 t\.lAF (25 MCM). In Lower Basin reservoirs, storage decreased <br />by approximately 2.48 MAF (3,060 MCM). Total Colorado River system storage decreased by <br />approximately 4.31 MAF (5,310 MCM) during water year 2001. Even with this decrease in <br />storage, Colorado River reservoirs remain relatively full with total system storage at 76 percent <br />of capacity as of September 30, 200 I. During 200 I, all deliveries of water to meet valid <br />obligations pursuant to applicable provisions of "The Law of the River" were maintained. <br /> <br />Tables I(a) and l(b) list the October I, 2001, reser-.-'oir vacant space, live storage, water <br />elevation, percent of capacity, change in storage, and change in water elevation during water year <br />2001. <br /> <br />October 15, 200 1 <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.