<br />of the project,
<br />In response, supporters of the project.
<br />led bv former GOY, Scott Matheson,
<br />forged a coalition which included such
<br />unlikely bedfellows as Democrat Ted
<br />Wilson and RepublicanSen, Orrin Hatch,
<br />Rival football coaches Ul VeIl Edwards of
<br />BYU and Jim Fassel of the University of
<br />Utah-whose expertise on the subject
<br />possibly stemmed from the fact thatthey
<br />both used water boy~ven co-<;tarred in
<br />a television spot
<br />Once again Uintah County roared its
<br />opposition, with 70 percen' voting
<br />against the contract, This time; percent
<br />of Wasatch County voters jomed them,
<br />concerned about the salet" of the
<br />Jordanelle Dam and the furore of their
<br />irrigation supply.
<br />Nevertheless, in thedistrictasa whole,
<br />73 percent 01 the voters agreed to repay
<br />an additional $368.5 million to the federal
<br />government
<br />However, in spite of the public man-
<br />
<br />By this time, environmental groups
<br />such as the NWF had realized that legiS-
<br />latotS who had little sympathy lor the
<br />plight of /ish species like the June SLoker
<br />would listen to arguments phrased In
<br />dollatS and cents,
<br />"Environmentalists have become inM
<br />creasinglv sophisticated to the point that
<br />they are the strongest advocates of ec0-
<br />nomic analysis of federal water resource
<br />projects," Osann said,
<br />That proficiency, plus a growing na-
<br />tional awareness of environmental is-
<br />sues, have given groups like the NWF
<br />considerable clout in Congress, '1fs the
<br />smart membetS of Congress who learn to
<br />work with them," said Tom Melling, leg-
<br />islative assistant to Wayne Owens, "II
<br />you try to roll over them, you lose,"
<br />That lact became quite apparent early
<br />in 1988 when Garn and Owens submitted
<br />a bill to increase the federal budget ceiling
<br />on the Colorado River Storage Project. of
<br />which the CUP was the largest leature
<br />
<br />
<br />date, there were signs that the CUP was
<br />losing its grip. For a start, Utah's repre-
<br />sentatives in Washington lelt increas-
<br />ingly frustrated with the Bureau's han-
<br />dling of the proJect According to a 1986
<br />Deseret News stoty, 18 percent 01 the total
<br />congressional appropriation for the CUP
<br />over the previous six yeatS had been
<br />channeled into other projects, and that as
<br />much as 40 percent 01 the remainder had
<br />paid administrative overhead.
<br />Garn introduced legislation to limit
<br />the Bureau's overhead to 20 percent
<br />"They lound ways to get around that," he
<br />said, "so I put in dollar amounts instead,"
<br />At the same time, scrutiny of all led-
<br />eral water reclamation programs was in-
<br />creasing in Washington. Why was one
<br />federal agency building new irrigation
<br />projects, people asked, while another
<br />agenCY was paying iarmers to take crops
<br />out 01 production'
<br />"It became increasingly clear that the
<br />reclamation program was out 01 step
<br />with overall iarm policy;" said Ed Osann,
<br />director of the water resources program
<br />lor the National Wildlile Federation
<br />(NWF),
<br />
<br />still under construction,
<br />'1t was a simple, one-paragraph bill
<br />asking for $750 million to complete' the
<br />project," Owens recalled, "Butthe leader-
<br />sinp of the House Interior Committee (in-
<br />cluding Rep, Morris Udall, D-Arlz.. and
<br />Rep, George Miller, D-CalifJ said it
<br />wouldn't /lv, Thev said, 'There's no wav
<br />under heaven v~u're gomg to get this
<br />through without getting the environ-
<br />mentalists aboard:"
<br />So Owens started in Utah by announc-
<br />ing a public meeting and inviting everY
<br />conceivable group with an interest in the
<br />environmental relorm of the CUP, Out of
<br />that gathering emerged the Utah Round-
<br />table of Sportsmen and Conservationists,
<br />a loose-knit group that claimed to'repre-
<br />sent more than 50,000 Utahns, Its first
<br />chairman was environmental lawyer
<br />Kenley Brunsdale, who would later be-
<br />come Owens'administrative assistant
<br />and, in 1990, would challenge Republi-
<br />can Jim Hansen in the First Congressional
<br />District. Among the campaign memora-
<br />bilia in Bnmsdale's 13th-floor Salt Ulke
<br />Citv office is an award irom the Utah
<br />Wildlife Federation naming hun Utah
<br />
<br />Conservationist of 1987.
<br />"We made this a grass-roots reform
<br />ehort because we knew we would need
<br />it to overcome the water.buffalo status
<br />quo:' said Brunsdale, using his pet nick-
<br />name for federal water reclamatlon inter-
<br />ests,
<br />The members of the Utah Roundtable
<br />took aIm at the Bureau and its 1964 plan
<br />tor the Bonneville Unit, a plan whose
<br />primary purpose was to deliver irriga-
<br />tion water to farms in the central part of
<br />the state,
<br />"That old plan was a fiscal disaster,'
<br />Brunsdale charged, "It was spending
<br />thousands af dollars per acre to deliver
<br />water to land that was worth a iraction of
<br />that. When the project was onginally con-
<br />ceived, the demand from the urban areas
<br />wasn't there" ,and it was developed at a
<br />time when we thought our environmen-
<br />tal resources were limitless,"
<br />By 1988, although about $1.2 billion
<br />had been spent on the CRSP. only about
<br />$10 million had been spent to lessen en-
<br />vironmental damage caused bv the proj-
<br />ect,
<br />
<br />A GIANT RECIRCUl.AnNG FOUNTAIN
<br />To many envirorunentahsts, nothing
<br />illustrated the Bureau's msensitivitv to
<br />environmental issues better than th~ so-
<br />called pumpback recirculation plan, Ac-
<br />cording to a 1980 agreement, the CUP
<br />was required to leave enough water in the
<br />streams ahected bv the collection svstem
<br />to supplv at least 50 percent of histonc
<br />trout habitat. Onewav to help do that. the
<br />Bureau suggested, would be to diver:
<br />water from wo tributanes-the ~orth
<br />Fork of the Duchesne River and Deep
<br />Creek. a tributarY of Currant Creek-and
<br />pump it back upstream, In other words,
<br />the /lows would be maintained bv turn-
<br />ing the two streams into giant recirculat-
<br />ing faun tains.
<br />A Bureau spokesman .recentlv dis-
<br />missed the much-maligned plan as a
<br />"straw man," to be pursued only as a last
<br />resort.-However, the Bureau's straw man
<br />became the environmentalists'pinata,
<br />'This was Rube Goldberg's wildest
<br />extravagance," Brunsdale said, "(This il-
<br />lustrates) the extent to which they were
<br />going to avoid the real issue. that thev
<br />were using too much water."
<br />One long-time critic of the CUP who
<br />participated in the Roundtable discus-
<br />SIOns was Fred Reimherr 01 the Stone/ly
<br />Society, a Utah group representing two
<br />national organizations, Trout Unlimited
<br />and the Federation of Flv Fishers,
<br />Reimherr charged that the Uinta Basin
<br />
|