Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. EHERSON: And no time limit made, -even after a short <br /> <br />period, say of ten years, it might need modification. As I <br /> <br />say, leav.e things ,up to the spirit of fair play, - the average, <br /> <br />human spirit that you could depend upon. <br /> <br />MR. NOHVIEL: I think that is a good suggestion. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: 'Then in that case, not to have a time limit, <br /> <br />but at the call of three, either three states, or two states <br /> <br />and the President ? <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: I wouldn't concur in that, with the call <br /> <br />at any time. <br /> <br />HR. S. B. DAVIS: I still am very much in favor of a <br /> <br />definite neH commission at the end ofa Clefinite period of <br /> <br />time, <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: How are we going to know what period of time <br /> <br />~~? . <br />~ffi. S. B. DAVIS:, Get together and discuss it, <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: If there is a provisio~ for the call by <br /> <br />the Governor it avoids the necessary legislation at that time, <br /> '.' <br />except the matter of providing for tIle expense, <br /> ~ffi. El'IERSON: It seems to me we'are'pretty sure of the <br /> <br />basic fact of sufficient ~Iater supply ,'.We rather recognize <br /> <br />that from the start, and it doesn't seem necessary that ~le <br /> <br /> <br />should set a time ,limit for'revision,--make it ten years or <br /> <br />any other short period, _ because if He are an~lhere near <br /> <br />right it probably never will come up. <br /> <br />14th-S,F. <br />26 <br /> <br />172 <br /> <br />172 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />