My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05499
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05499
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:04:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
4/1/1997
Author
Mueller and Hiebert
Title
Assessment of Kokanee Salmon Transport through Blue Mesa Powerplant - Colorado - During the Spring and Summer of 1994-1996
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />002~J9 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />10 cm. By August, this proportion declined to about 50 percent with <br />40 percent of the fishery made up of large (,20 cm) fish. The <br />percentage of large fish declined in October to approximately <br />20 percent. We also broke down the densities of small fish in an <br />attempt to possibly follow any major movement of small fish though the <br />reservoir. Fish <10 cm were abundant in the Cebolla and Sapinero <br />basins in June but declined dramatically in August and October. This <br />in itself is misleading. These declines are probably influenced by <br />small kokanee moving closer to the surface to feed on the zooplankton. <br />Young kokanee were frequently observed feeding near the surface which <br />would make them virtually invisible to hydroacoustic gear. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Fish passage through Blue Mesa Powerplant is not new. It's common <br />knowledge that some fish are lost from the reservoir due to powerplant <br />operations. A percentage of these fish do survive and contribute to <br />the downstream fishery. Actually. facilities were designed, <br />installed, and at one time operated to recapture kokanee that had <br />successfully passed downstream and were migrating back upstream to <br />spawn. However, what has changed is a growing concern for threatened <br />and endangered fish further downstream. In 1991, FWS recommended test <br />flow criteria for the Gunnison River near Grand Junction, Colorado. <br />Flow criteria were designed to guide reservoir releases to more <br />closely mimic historical spring/summer flows (McAda and Kaeding 1991) <br />Blue Mesa Reservoir provides the largest volume of water available to <br />meet these criteria. Long-term recommendations will be provided by <br />FWS in 1998. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Blue Mesa Reservoir represents a premier kokanee fishery not only for <br />angler harvest, but also as an important source of kokanee eggs for <br />hatchery production in Colorado and other states. Colorado Division <br />of Wildlife (CDOW) expressed concern that increases in spring releases <br />may impact this important resource. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation funded this study to take a precursory look at fish <br />transport associated with flow recommendations and determine if <br />losses were impacting the reservoir's kokanee salmon fishery. <br />If there was evidence suggesting that significant fish losses <br />were occurring, a second, more refined sampling effort would <br />then be warranted. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.