Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />on.2 Hl7 <br /> <br />~elagic fish population estimates were calculated by two methods. One <br />method used the average fish density developed for the entire <br />reservoir while the second used average values produced for each <br />separate basin. These estimates were based on the following data or <br />assumptions: <br /> <br />. Fish were not randomly distributed throughout the reservoir, a <br />statistical analysis of survey means rather than transect averages <br />were most appropriate, <br /> <br />. Vertical gill netting data of kokanee (96% measured) represents an <br />accurate representation and proportion of the pelagic fish community <br />(Johnson et al. 1995). <br /> <br />Surface elevation of Blue Mesa reservoir during June, August, and <br />October 1994, was 2,289, 2,287, and 2,284 m respectively and 2,290 m <br />in 1995. The majority of fish were found at a depth between 20 and <br />35 m. We therefore, adjust the surface area to reflect the area used <br />by fish community to calculate units of fish per surface area <br />(fish/ha). Since the elevation range was similar, we chose to use <br />August's elevation to simplify calculations (2,287-20=2,267 m). The <br />surface area of elevation 2,267 m is 2,028 ha (5,010 acres) based on <br />existing area-capacity information (Bureau of Reclamation,1975). <br />Reservoir elevation in 1995 was higher, at 2,290 m, or a surface <br />elevation of 2,258 ha (5,580 acres). <br /> <br />Surveys (Figures 9, 10, 11 & 12)suggested that fish distribution was <br />not random, but sKewed or contagious, making it inappropriate to test <br />the variance of individual transect densities. However, we can set <br />confidence limits for the two data sets collected in both August and <br />October 1994. <br /> <br />The average fish density measured in the June 1994, survey was <br />485 fish/ha. Based on 2,028 hectares the reservoir's pelagic fish <br />population is estimated at 983,580 fish (Table 5). During the two <br />August fish surveys, average pelagic fish densities were measured at <br />344.3 and 329.8 fish/ha with an average of 337 fish/ha (STD=7.63). <br />using a Student's T analysis and a 90 percent confidence interval <br />(a=.10) the average fish density of Blue Mesa Reservoir was 337 ~ 48 <br />fish/ha. The reservoirs pelagic fish population was estimated (337 ~ <br />48 fish/ha X 2,028 ha) at approximately 683,436 ( ~ 97,344) fish, <br />based on a surface area of 2,028 ha. It's estimated with 90 percent <br />confidence the pelagic fishery is somewhere between 586,092 and <br />780,780 fish. October's estimate was 263,600 fish with a range of <br />14,200 to 513,100. The average density in 1995 was 201 fish/ha. <br />Estimated kokanee population for 1995 based on 2,258 surface hectares <br />was 454,000 fish. <br /> <br />23 <br />