Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />:"'l!' ~ ' 15 <br /> <br />V~~~i~a! D:s:ributicr.. The maJority of fish detected duri~9 the Jur.e <br />survey were :ou~d within 5 meters of the surface (Figures 23, l~, and <br />15). Not bei~g :~enmally stressed, fish were feeding in the mOre <br />productive surface waters. However. as the reservoir warmed and <br />became stratified. adult kokanee were fo~~d concentrated at cooler <br />depths. By August, adult kokanee were restricted to depths between 15 <br />and 25 meters and by October they had retreated still deeper, the <br />majority being fo~~d between depths of 20 and 30 meters. Intake <br />Surve~'. A comparison of dlel fish distribution in front of the intake <br />revealed a marked difference in vertical distribution and schooling <br />behavior between daylight and night hours (Figure 16). During the <br /> <br /> Diel Fish Distribution <br />Blue Mesa Intake Tower <br />!l Aug, 1995 July 8, 1996 July 9, 1996 <br />co <br />co -i__ <br />~ <br />- <br />E <br />- <br />.e <br />- <br />a. <br />" <br />0 <br />co <br />M <br /> ."'" <br />on <br />... <br /> 0.-% -100 0-%-100 <br /> ffilDay _Night <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />= <br />.. <br /> <br />I!ii6 <br /> <br />.... <br />- <br />:m <br /> <br />Figure 16. Comparison of daylight and night fish <br />distribution (\fish detect/5 m strata) in the intake <br />channel at Blue Mesa Dam, 1995 and 1996. <br /> <br />21 <br />