My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05498
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05498
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:04:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/1/1981
Author
Six State High Plain
Title
Six State High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer Area Study - Energy Price and Technology Assessment - Energy Regulatory Analysis
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />concept of cumulative deficiencies. Basically, this required that the differ- <br />ence between BPClls and actual sales, when these were below the BPCl, <br />would accumulate each month and before any new oil could be sold at new <br />oil prices from the property, the cumulative deficiency had to be eliminated. 9 <br />When FEO regulations under EPAA were issued in January 1974, old <br />oil was price controlled at $5.25/bbl while world market prices, controlled <br />by OPEC, were at about $12.00/bbl.15 This resulted in a weighted average <br />price of $9.00/bbl of crude oil to US refiners. The amount by which this <br />and subsequent monthly weighted average prices exceeded the May 1973 <br />acquisition cost could be passed through in the price of refinery products. <br /> <br />2.2.3.2 Exemptions from Price Controls. The EPAA initially exempted <br />stripper well production from price controls. To claim this exemption, the <br />property had to be certified as having production of less than 10 barrels <br />per day per well or less for 12 consecutive months. In May 1975, admini- <br />strative regulations allowed such properties to subsequently increase their <br />production and still remain exempt from price controls .16 <br />This measure was viewed by regulators as an incentive for increasing <br />domestic production from old wells in which recovery capability had de- <br />clined; however, significant increases could only be accomplished through <br />waterflood or enhanced recovery techniques which were likely to affect the <br />production of adjoining properties and, therefore, required unitization.* <br />In September 1978, regulations allowed for more favorable treatment of <br />stripper well properties that joined units .17 This action created some <br />increased incentive for producers to use enhanced recovery techniques. <br /> <br /> <br />2.2.3.3 Supply Allocation Programs Under EPAA. The regulatory programs <br />which held down prices were accompanied by regulatory programs for alle- <br />viating supply shortages in certain sectors. EPAA authorized such programs <br />for both crude petroleum and refined products. Basically, the programs <br /> <br />*Separate leases are joined by contract and managed for optimal pro- <br />duction as one property. <br /> <br />2-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.