My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05477
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:03:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/20/2003
Title
BOR-Tribal Funding Brief
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />0203-~ <br /> <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMATION <br /> <br />BRIEFING FOR: Tribal Funding under the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management <br />Program (a Federal Advisory Committee) DATE: Oct 20, 2003 <br /> <br />ISSUE AND PURPOSE: Department of the Interior agencies (Bureau of Indian Affairs, <br />Bureau of Reclamation, National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. <br />Geological Survey) want to continue to assist tribes financially to participate in and <br />consult on issues discussed at meetings of a federal advisory committee, the Glen Canyon <br />Dam Adaptive Management Work Group. Legal authorities must be specified to enable <br />the agencies to enter into an interagency agreement to combine appropriated dollars and <br />then to have one agency transfer the dollars to the tribes through cooperative agreements. <br /> <br />If government-to-government consultation is the legal authority for the transfer of federal <br />appropriated dollars to the tribes, does this comply with Departmental policies? Most <br />Interior agencies do not pay consultation fees for paid tribal employees. Most agencies <br />only pay consultation fees if the services and expertise of an unpaid tribal representative <br />are required by the agency for a specific federal action or consultation purpose. All tribal <br />representatives in this federal advisory committee are full-time tribal employees paid by <br />the cooperative agreements. <br /> <br />Therefore, the two main issues are what authorities might be used to enter into <br />interagency and tribal agreements to enable paid tribal representatives to participate in <br />and consult on a federal advisory committee, and whether such financial assistance <br />complies with Department policy on consultation with Indian tribal governments. <br /> <br />CURRENT STATUS: The Secretary of the Interior has appointed the agencies listed <br />above, as well as the Hopi Tribe, Hualapai Tribe, Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians, Navajo <br />Nation, Pueblo of Zuni, and Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah as members ofa federal advisory <br />committee, the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group. The tribes <br />participate in the committee because of their cultural interests in the Colorado River <br />below Glen Canyon Dam. Previous assistance agreements funding a full-time <br />representative from each of the five tribes that are members of the federal advisory <br />committee have expired. Without new funding agreements in fiscal year 2004, the tribes <br />have informed the agencies that they will not participate in the advisory committee. The <br />federal agencies believe this would be a significant loss and would be contrary to the <br />Secretary of the Interior's intent in appointing the tribes as committee members, along <br />with the federal agencies, states, and other stakeholders in Colorado River issues. <br /> <br />The agencies and the tribes recognize that it is not a full-time job preparing for and <br />participating in the two annual meetings of the federal advisory committee (and related <br />work groups); however, the tribes lack the staff to participate fully in the federal advisory <br />committee without federal assistance. The position of the agencies is that absence of the <br />tribes would be detrimental to the committee in making reasoned recommendations to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.