My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05470
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05470
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:03:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1980
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1979
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. "4",-. <br />LV:;, <br /> <br />of the California Department of Fish <br />and Game, the Beal Slough backwater <br />on the California side of the Colorado <br />River between Needles and Topack <br />was dredged by the Water and Power <br />Resources Service in order to deepen <br />the backwater at low river stages. <br />Improvement of habitat for fish and <br />wildlife and development of <br />recreational facilities within the sloURh <br />was initiated. <br />Also durinl!: 1979 the Work Group <br />initiated a study of the nt't'd for <br />clearing the vegetation-covered flood <br />plain of the Colorado River near <br />Yuma, Arizona. An evaluation was <br />made of the value of the existing <br />habitat for both aquatic and terrestrial <br />species and of alternative methods of <br />strip clearing in order to increase <br />channel conveyance capacity while at <br />the same time leaving some <br />undisturbed habitat. <br />A subcommittee of the Work Group <br />adopted a plan of study for channel <br />stabilization and environmental <br />enhancement in the Parker II Division <br />which calls for preparation of <br />Environmental Quality and National <br />Economic Development plans under <br />the Water Resources Council's new <br />Principles and Standards. While these <br />plans were being slowly df'veloped, <br />the excess flows that were released <br />during the year accelerated the <br />existing rates of stream scour and <br />bank cutting. with resultant delf'terious <br />impacts downstream from the <br />sediment being picked up and <br />deposited. To lessen damages from <br />expf'Cted continued high releases, the <br />Service plans to expedite development <br />of alternative stabilizdtion medsures. <br />The Work Group also approved <br />pldns for dredging and develop.ing <br />marsh backwaters in the Impenal <br />National Wildlift." Refuge. pldnned as <br />part of the Bicentennidl Ldnd HeritaRe <br />Projects and utilizing funds from that <br />source. <br /> <br />legal Issues <br /> <br />Arizona \', California <br /> <br />The Board's 1978 Annual Report <br />described the final settlement of the <br />almost 15-year-old issue of present <br />perfected rights. culminating in a <br />January 9, 1979 supplemental df'Cree <br />of the United States Supreme Court. <br />As defined in the 1964 Df'Cree, <br />present perff'Cted rights arf" <br />mainstream water rights acquired <br />undPr statf' law and exercised by an <br />actual diversion, or fedf"ral reserved <br />water rights, both established prior 10 <br />June 25, 1929, the effective date of <br />the Boulder Canyon Project Act. <br />In addition to entering the <br />supplemental decrt>e, the Court also <br />referred to a Special Master the <br />Df'Cember 21, 1978 motion of the <br />United States and several motions of <br />the five lower Colorado River Indian <br />tribes made during 1977 and 1978 fOf <br />modification of the decree to permit <br />diversion of additional Colorado River <br />water to the five reservations. These <br /> <br />H.lI,gu [,]I..t' N,llinn,lf Wihllift' ReflJRl', <br />T ofJock GOft::P <br /> <br />motions are de!>cribed in the Board's <br />1977 and 1978 Annual Reports. As <br />Slated in the government's motion, <br />the claims are for water for two <br />categories of lands: (1) "addition..1 <br />practicably irrigable lands" as a resuh <br />of "boundary adjustments, effected <br />since the entry of the Decree of <br />March 9, 1964," amounting to 65,806 <br />acre-feel of additional diversions, and <br />(2) "practicably irrigable lands which <br />were erroneously omitted from <br />consideration" and which were within <br />the recognized boundaries of the <br />reservations at the time of the decree, <br />amounting to 20,306 acre-feet of <br />additional diversions. The additional <br />consumptive use resulting from these <br />diversions is estimated to be between <br />43,000 and 59,000 acre-feet. <br />In February 1979, the "state <br />parties", comprising the States of <br />Arizona, California, and Nevada, and <br />Ihe seven California public agencies <br />(Palo Verde Irrigation District, <br />Coachella Valley Water District, <br />Imperial Irrigation District. The <br />Metropolitan Water District of <br />Southern California, Cily of Los <br />Angeles, City of San Diego, and <br />County of San Diego) filed one <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.