Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O CJ -,0 ,,) <br />l ,-,0 oJ d <br /> <br />~*Q. -, <br />J: /1, /~ <br />4'//1.. <br />....t.,....'. .'f. <br />....,., . <br />41 ' " .'. I'} <br />,.41? 0 '-" <br />9" <br />cQ' (',7,:..) ~7<, <br />,.'s..~.'?oi;;". 1'(4r..., <br />. !j,o'f{ ..,. <br />October through February 9recipitation over the Upper Colorado~r <br />Basin varied from 96 percent of mormal for the Colorado River water- <br />sheri above Cisco, Utah, to 100 percent of normal for the Green River <br />water shed above Green River, Utah, and 68 percent of normal for the <br />San Juan River watershed ,,:,nve Bluff, Utah, Based on this snd snow <br />data, the forecast runoff of the Colorado River and tributaries at <br />damsites of the Colorado River Storage Project is as follows: <br /> <br />UNITED ETATllS <br />DEPARrMENT OF THE INTERI')1l <br />'JUREAU OF RECLAMATIOIl <br />GALT LAKE CITY, UTAH <br /> <br />March 1, 1972 <br /> <br />Forecast of April-July 1972 Reservoir Inflow in 1,000 Acre-Feet <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> Fonte- Blue Flaming Lake <br /> . ne lle Navajo Mesa Gorge P,,'.e 11 <br />Unadjusted most probable 650 <br />forecast 1,200 7130 1,900 6,900 <br />Transmounta1n diversion <br />and storage changes in y- 10 Y-bOO <br />amal1 project reservoirs Nune - L<O - 10 <br />Adjusted most probable 640 1,890 8,300 <br />forecast 1,200 '(OO <br />Deviation from most proba- <br />ble forecast 1/ +280 <br />90 percent +350 +30() '300 ,:,3,100 <br />50 percent +110 ~230 +130 ~130 .:.1,100 <br />~ercent of 1906-68 inflow -138 94 -82 163 100 <br /> <br />Y Does not reflect storage changes at Fontenelle Reservoir. <br /> <br />S! Does not reflect storage changes at FlaminC Gorge, Navajo, <br />Morrow Point, Blue Mesa, and Fontenelle Reservoirs, <br /> <br />11 Percent of the time actual runoff will not deviate from the <br />most probable forecast more than the amount shown, <br /> <br />Lake pawell forecast is derived from a summation of three tributary <br />forecasts: The Green River at Green River, Utah; the San Juan River <br />at Bluff, Utah; and the Colorado River near Cisco, Utah, Each of the <br />tributary forecasts is derived by correlation of the April-through-July <br />runoff (adjusted for major diversions and storage changes) with the <br />previous October-through-February precipitation and ~mxch 1 w~tcr <br />e'lui'la.lent of snow, Data from 58 precipitation stations and 50 snow <br />courses located throughout the basins are used, <br />