Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0003~2 <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Backqround <br /> <br />Any discussion about metropolitan cooperation dealing with water <br />supplies must recognize the inherent legal underpinnings of our water <br />rights system. This system recognizes seniority of water rights based on <br />time and the transferability of these rights relying on market conditions. <br /> <br />. Colorado has no comprehensive "water plan" that directs the <br />development and use of water. The Colorado Constitution provides the <br />basis for a system of water allocation which relies on a market-oriented <br />system. The state's prior appropriation system is sufficiently unique <br />that it is frequently referred to as the Colorado doctrine. <br /> <br />While Colorado does not have a coherent water plan or policy, it <br />does have a legal and institutional framework for establishing water <br />policies which goes far beyond the individual right of appropriation. <br />Legislative, executive, and judicial decisions have served to generate <br />Colorado's water policy. Thus, the state relies principally upon the <br />free market for the allocation of water; however, these allocation <br />decisions are bounded by other public-interest concerns as reflected in <br />court decisions and state statutues. <br /> <br />Concerns over water have changed. Generally speaking, until the <br />past two decades, Colorado was primarily concerned about preserving its <br />share of water under interstate compacts. This was accomplished through <br />the development of water storage projects, especially federal-reclamation <br />projects. In recent years, other concerns have also surfaced, but not <br />supplanted this more traditional concern. Examples include: <br /> <br />o Protection of underground aquifers and novel efforts to <br />integrate surface water and groundwater resources. <br /> <br />o Protection of environmental values and the creation of a state <br />in-stream flow program. <br /> <br />o Protection of endangered species including the passage of a <br />state Endangered Species Act. <br /> <br />o Protection of water quality and the enactment of the Water <br />Quality Control Act. <br /> <br />There have been efforts to add more efficiency to the system. The <br />Colorado Water and Power Development Authority has undertaken <br />basin-by-basin studies to identify water project opportunities. A <br />satellite monitoring system allows the state to more accurately guage and <br />manage flows. And, more pertinent to the present concern, Governor Lamm <br />established a Metropolitan Roundtable which established a forum in which <br />opposing interests could legitimately express their views about Colorado <br />water policy and, in particular, how water would be supplied to <br />metropolitan entities. <br />