My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05450
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:24 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:02:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.114.I
Description
Dolores Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
2/1/1995
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Draft Environmental Assessment - Proposal to Modify Operation of McPhee Reservoir and Acquire Additional Water for Fish and Wildlife Purposes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />ROUNDTAIL CHUB <br /> <br />The roundtail chub is commonly found throughout much of the Dolores River <br />downstream of McPhee Dam. While populations of this species have declined in <br />. other ri~er basins (most notably in the San Juan River Basin) over recent <br />years, they have persisted in the Dolores River drainage. Apparently tolerant <br />of changes in wide flow variations, management of spills from McPhee Dam may <br />play a far more significant role in maintaining a healthy population of these <br />fish in the Dolores River than do base flows. Since the closure .of McPhee <br />Dam, successful natural reproduction by this species has been verified in the <br />Dolores River (pers. comm. Mike Japhet CDOW, 1994) including 1990 when flow <br />was reduced to 20 cfs, the only time this occurred since the closure of the <br />dam in 1984. Spawning occurred over a wide range of flow conditions over the <br />years indicating base flow may not be a significant factor for successful <br />spawning. High spring flows, of sufficient magnitude, duration and timing may <br />be much more important in providing suitable conditions for successful <br />reproduction by this species than do the magnitude of post run-off base flows. <br />unfortunately, although successful spawning has been verified, the extent of <br />recruitment of young-of-the-year chubs to spawning age is not known. While <br />chub flow tolerances are not well understood in the Dolores River, extreme low <br />flows (20 cfs) may limit young-of-the-year habitat and survival for this <br />species and should be avoided (Valdez, et al., 1992). Under the proposed pool <br />management strategy, such extreme low flow conditions would be avoided. <br />Consequently, it is unlikely any of the proposed pool management alternatives <br />would adversely affect this species in the Dolores River. <br /> <br />FLANNBLMOtlTH SUCKER <br /> <br />The flannelmouth sucker, unlike the roundtail chub, is considered abundant in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin. While this species is relatively rare in the <br />Lower Colorado River Basin due to massive habitat alterations, it has not been <br />subjected to the same level of impact in the upper basin. This species is <br />considered to be common in the Dolores River. <br /> <br />Successful natural reproduction by this species in the Dolores River has been <br />verified since the closure of McPhee Dam (pers. comm. Mike Japhet, CDOW, <br />1994). There is not sufficient information available at this time regarding <br />recruitment of young-of-the-year suckers to adulthood. As described above <br />for the roundtail chub, extreme low flows associated with the No Action <br />Alternative might have an adverse affect on this species. As with other <br />Colorado River endemic fish species, the timing, magnitude and duration of <br />spring flushing flows (spill management) may be significant in maintaining <br />this species in the Dolores River. Since extreme low flows are avoided after <br />spawning and through the fall with all of the pool management alternatives, <br />none of these alternatives should effect this species in the Dolores River. <br /> <br />SAN JUAN RIVER <br />The Dolores Project was constructed and is operated to divert water from the <br />Dolores River basin for beneficial use in the San Juan River basin. However, <br />the project is not yet fully developed and much of the planned use of project <br />water is not yet occurring. Project water not consumptively used in the San <br />Juan Basin, would flow in to the San Juan River through three drainages. The <br />majority of water not consumptively used would enter the San Juan River at the <br />confluence of McElmo Creek, near Aneth, Utah. Some water would also return to <br />the San Juan River via Navajo Wash/Mancos River and some water would be <br />conveyed by Montezuma Creek. <br /> <br />Historical return flows from non-project diversions are included in the USGS <br />flow records of the San Juan River at Bluff, Utah. These flow data were part <br />of the existing baseline conditions described in the Animas La Plata Project <br />Biological Opinion (USFWS, 1991). In addition, Project return flows were <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.