Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Landowner rights compatible with fiSh protection, officials say <br /> <br />To some Colorado River Basin resi- <br />dents, the phrases "endangered fish" <br />and "critical habitat protection" may <br />conjure up fearful images offederal of- <br />ficials calling a halt to all property <br />oWners'land management plans. <br />But residents' in the region can put" <br />, those drastic fears to rest, according to <br />the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the' <br />agency responsible for administering <br />the Endangered Species Act. <br />"People may not lDlderstand what 'crit- <br />ical habitat' means," said Patty Schrader, a <br />Service biologist who handles endan- <br />geredspecies pennitsin;GrandJunction, , <br />Colo. "If their land is Within critical habi- <br />'tat for endangered fish, they may think <br />their projects will be shut down or that the <br />government will takti their property. <br />, "But that's not the case. We almost <br />always find an alternative solution." <br />The March 21; 1994, designation of <br />1,980 miles of critical habitat for en- <br />dangered Colorado River fish under the <br />Endangered SpeCies Act was the out- <br />come of a lawsuit by the Sierra Club <br />Legal Defense Fund arid a subsequent <br />court order. In certain circumstances <br />the Service now has more authority to <br />protect the waters and land considered <br />critical to the fishes' recovery. <br />"Our goal is tll protect endangered <br />fish, habitat while also allowing for <br />economic development and mainte- <br />nance of sport fisheries;" said Ralph <br />Morgenweck, director of the, 'Denver- <br />'based Mountain-Prairie Region of the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Some' <br />projects may not be compatible with <br />our efforts to balance these concerns. <br />But most can' be made acceptable if <br />,landowners work with our field staff <br />early in the proposal process." <br />For critical habitat rules to apply, <br />there must be some type offederal in- <br />volvement.' Private landowners could <br />be affecled by critical habitat rules <br />when their planned action requires fed- <br />eral authorization, such as a permit or <br />license, or when they are receiving <br />federal fu.i1ding, including federal <br />loans or Natural Resources Conserva- . <br />tion Service money for constructing a <br />pond. <br />'For example, section 404 of the <br />Clean Water Act generally requires <br />landowners to obtain permits from the <br /> <br /> <br />4,000 <br /> <br />"' <br />~' <br />::E <br /> <br />Historical Habitat <br /> <br />Daslgnated Critical Habitat <br /> <br />The amount of habitat designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlifa Service for <br />endangered Colorado River fish Is only 30 parcent of what existed originally. <br /> <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when <br />planning to stabilize a riverbank, exca- <br />vate an area near waters in' the 100- <br />year flood plain or place "fill material" <br />in the water or in a wetland: These <br />types of action include dredging, fill- <br />ing in wetlands, 'mining for sand and <br />gravel, constructing boat ramps and . <br />'placing rocks in the river to build <br />riprap; jetties or small dams. <br />"That doesn't mean all these activi- <br />ties are prohibited:' Schrader said. "If <br />the area does not provide all the ele- <br />ments needed by the fish, it would not <br />be considered critical habitill,' and the <br />project would not affect the fish." <br />When a project's," only impact to <br />, critical habitat is water depletion, tlie <br />Service considers it to be offset by re~ <br />covery actions undertaken by the Re- <br />covery Program, as long as 'the' pro- <br />gram ,contiilUes to make sufficient <br />progress in impleinentingthose actions. <br />,- Even projects in areas important for <br />the fish may be acceptable. It may be <br />possible to complete gravel excavation <br />projects that eventually would benefit <br />endangered fish, expmined biologist <br />Mike Tucker. <br />If, after gravel is removed, river wa- <br />ter could be channeled to flow through <br />the excavation site, what once was an <br />isolated gravel pit could become a <br />backWater or other habitat needed by <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />endangered fish. <br />To obtain permits, landowners <br />should contact the local office of the <br />Corps of Engineers. <br />In the upper Colorado RiVer Basin, <br />critical habitat includes the Colorado <br />River from Rifle, Colo., to, Lake Pow- <br />ell; the Gunnison RiVer from Delta, <br />Colo., to Grand Junction; the Yampa <br />River from Craig, Colo., to the Green <br />River; and the White River from Rio <br />Blanco Dam to the Green RiVer; and <br />the Green River from Dinosaur Na- <br />tional Monument to Lake Powell. <br />Critical habitat is defmed as all ar- <br />eas within the I OOCyear flood plain,that <br />provide the' following: <br />- Asufficientquality and quantity <br />of water needed by the fish at each life <br />stage. <br />- Physical characteristics such as <br />'side channels, backwaterS, flood plains <br />arid bottom lands, which are used by <br />the fIsh as spawning, nursery, feeding <br />and rearing, sites. <br />- An adequate food supply and <br />other biological factors. <br />"Endangered fish need habitats such <br />as flooded bottom lands, oxbows, side <br />channels and backwaters;' Schrader <br />said. "If these areas are cut off, filled in <br />or stabilized, the fish don't have the <br />habitat they need to complete all life <br />stages and reach recovery." <br />