|
<br />Landowner rights compatible with fiSh protection, officials say
<br />
<br />To some Colorado River Basin resi-
<br />dents, the phrases "endangered fish"
<br />and "critical habitat protection" may
<br />conjure up fearful images offederal of-
<br />ficials calling a halt to all property
<br />oWners'land management plans.
<br />But residents' in the region can put"
<br />, those drastic fears to rest, according to
<br />the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the'
<br />agency responsible for administering
<br />the Endangered Species Act.
<br />"People may not lDlderstand what 'crit-
<br />ical habitat' means," said Patty Schrader, a
<br />Service biologist who handles endan-
<br />geredspecies pennitsin;GrandJunction, ,
<br />Colo. "If their land is Within critical habi-
<br />'tat for endangered fish, they may think
<br />their projects will be shut down or that the
<br />government will takti their property.
<br />, "But that's not the case. We almost
<br />always find an alternative solution."
<br />The March 21; 1994, designation of
<br />1,980 miles of critical habitat for en-
<br />dangered Colorado River fish under the
<br />Endangered SpeCies Act was the out-
<br />come of a lawsuit by the Sierra Club
<br />Legal Defense Fund arid a subsequent
<br />court order. In certain circumstances
<br />the Service now has more authority to
<br />protect the waters and land considered
<br />critical to the fishes' recovery.
<br />"Our goal is tll protect endangered
<br />fish, habitat while also allowing for
<br />economic development and mainte-
<br />nance of sport fisheries;" said Ralph
<br />Morgenweck, director of the, 'Denver-
<br />'based Mountain-Prairie Region of the
<br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Some'
<br />projects may not be compatible with
<br />our efforts to balance these concerns.
<br />But most can' be made acceptable if
<br />,landowners work with our field staff
<br />early in the proposal process."
<br />For critical habitat rules to apply,
<br />there must be some type offederal in-
<br />volvement.' Private landowners could
<br />be affecled by critical habitat rules
<br />when their planned action requires fed-
<br />eral authorization, such as a permit or
<br />license, or when they are receiving
<br />federal fu.i1ding, including federal
<br />loans or Natural Resources Conserva- .
<br />tion Service money for constructing a
<br />pond.
<br />'For example, section 404 of the
<br />Clean Water Act generally requires
<br />landowners to obtain permits from the
<br />
<br />
<br />4,000
<br />
<br />"'
<br />~'
<br />::E
<br />
<br />Historical Habitat
<br />
<br />Daslgnated Critical Habitat
<br />
<br />The amount of habitat designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlifa Service for
<br />endangered Colorado River fish Is only 30 parcent of what existed originally.
<br />
<br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when
<br />planning to stabilize a riverbank, exca-
<br />vate an area near waters in' the 100-
<br />year flood plain or place "fill material"
<br />in the water or in a wetland: These
<br />types of action include dredging, fill-
<br />ing in wetlands, 'mining for sand and
<br />gravel, constructing boat ramps and .
<br />'placing rocks in the river to build
<br />riprap; jetties or small dams.
<br />"That doesn't mean all these activi-
<br />ties are prohibited:' Schrader said. "If
<br />the area does not provide all the ele-
<br />ments needed by the fish, it would not
<br />be considered critical habitill,' and the
<br />project would not affect the fish."
<br />When a project's," only impact to
<br />, critical habitat is water depletion, tlie
<br />Service considers it to be offset by re~
<br />covery actions undertaken by the Re-
<br />covery Program, as long as 'the' pro-
<br />gram ,contiilUes to make sufficient
<br />progress in impleinentingthose actions.
<br />,- Even projects in areas important for
<br />the fish may be acceptable. It may be
<br />possible to complete gravel excavation
<br />projects that eventually would benefit
<br />endangered fish, expmined biologist
<br />Mike Tucker.
<br />If, after gravel is removed, river wa-
<br />ter could be channeled to flow through
<br />the excavation site, what once was an
<br />isolated gravel pit could become a
<br />backWater or other habitat needed by
<br />
<br />10
<br />
<br />endangered fish.
<br />To obtain permits, landowners
<br />should contact the local office of the
<br />Corps of Engineers.
<br />In the upper Colorado RiVer Basin,
<br />critical habitat includes the Colorado
<br />River from Rifle, Colo., to, Lake Pow-
<br />ell; the Gunnison RiVer from Delta,
<br />Colo., to Grand Junction; the Yampa
<br />River from Craig, Colo., to the Green
<br />River; and the White River from Rio
<br />Blanco Dam to the Green RiVer; and
<br />the Green River from Dinosaur Na-
<br />tional Monument to Lake Powell.
<br />Critical habitat is defmed as all ar-
<br />eas within the I OOCyear flood plain,that
<br />provide the' following:
<br />- Asufficientquality and quantity
<br />of water needed by the fish at each life
<br />stage.
<br />- Physical characteristics such as
<br />'side channels, backwaterS, flood plains
<br />arid bottom lands, which are used by
<br />the fIsh as spawning, nursery, feeding
<br />and rearing, sites.
<br />- An adequate food supply and
<br />other biological factors.
<br />"Endangered fish need habitats such
<br />as flooded bottom lands, oxbows, side
<br />channels and backwaters;' Schrader
<br />said. "If these areas are cut off, filled in
<br />or stabilized, the fish don't have the
<br />habitat they need to complete all life
<br />stages and reach recovery."
<br />
|