Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />')0"','''' <br />.., , ,) <br /> <br />F. Mt. Elbert Conduit/Halfmoon Creek Diversion <br /> <br />During water year 1990, 87,900 acre-feet of water was released from <br />Turquoise Lake and 10,800 acre-feet of water diverted at Halfmoon Creek <br />Diversion through Mt. Elbert Conduit to Mt. Elbert Forebay (exhibit 10). <br />In addition, 4,220 acre-feet of water was released into Mt. Elbert conduit <br />from Turquoise Lake for use by the Leadville Federal fish hatchery. <br /> <br />G. Twin Lakes/Mt. Elbert Forebav and Mt. Elbert PumDed-StoraQe <br />PowerDlant <br /> <br />On September 30, 1989, the lake surface elevation of Twin Lakes was <br />9169.76 feet with a content of 74,750 acre-feet of water (66 percent of <br />normal). Mt. Elbert Forebay water surface elevation was at 9639.36 feet <br />with a content of 9,440 acre-feet (123 percent of normal). Exhibits 11 and <br />12 show the precipitation and pan evaporation at Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />Twin Lakes was operated throughout the year bypassing native inflow in <br />excess of storage rights, releasing project water to Pueblo Reservoir, and <br />drawing water out of storage for the City of Colorado Springs upon demand. <br />Part of the project water was retained upstream until July and August to <br />provide additional water for recreational purposes on the Arkansas River and <br />at Pueblo Reservoir. The higher evaporation rate in Pueblo Reservoir was <br />also considered when making the decision to leave the water in Twin Lakes. <br />Project water was released from Twin Lakes during July and August at rates <br />which would, in addition to native Arkansas River ~ater, provide <br />approximately 700 ft3/s at the ga9ing station at Wellsville. The releases <br />also were made to coincide with project demands on Pueblo Reservoir. These <br />releases made it possible to maintain Pueblo Reservoir at a higher level <br />which provided for better recreation. Table 8 and exhibit 13 show Twin <br />Lakes/Mt. Elbert Forebay operation for water year 1990. <br /> <br />Mt. Elbert Pumped-Storage Powerplant had at least one unit available <br />throughout the water year. The powerplant had 98,700 acre-feet of flow <br />through water available along with 193,540 acre-feet of water pumped from <br />Twin Lakes. The powerplant generated 104,758,000 kilowatt-hours or <br />96 percent of average during water year 1990 with 281,890 acre-feet of water <br />(table 9). <br /> <br />Twin Lakes/Mt. Elbert Forebay combined storage totaled 117,630 acre-feet <br />(97 percent of normal) at the end of the water year. Twin Lakes storage was <br />108,460 acre-feet and Mt. Elbert Forebay was 9,170 acre-feet. These storage <br />quantities represent 95 percent and 120 percent, respectively. <br /> <br />H. Pueblo Reservoir <br /> <br />At the end of water year 1989, Pueblo Reservoir content was <br />113,500 acre-feet. The Winter Water Storage Program was in effect from <br />November 15 through March 14 allowing the maximum daily storage in Pueblo <br />Reservoir of 36,020 acre-feet of water. Of the 36,020 acre-feet of winter <br />water stored, 21,800 acre-feet was released, 2,240 acre-feet evaporated and <br />12,240 acre-feet remained in storage at the end of the water year. In <br />addition to the 1989-1990 winter water releases, 6,210 acre-feet of <br /> <br />19 <br />